Back to Insights
AI Security & Data ProtectionGuidePractitioner

AI Vendor Certifications Explained: SOC2, ISO27001, and What They Mean

October 17, 202510 min readMichael Lansdowne Hauge
For:IT DirectorsProcurement LeadersSecurity EngineersCompliance Officers

Demystify security certifications for AI vendors. Understand what SOC 2, ISO 27001, and other certifications actually prove about vendor security.

Tech Devops Monitoring - ai security & data protection insights

Key Takeaways

  • 1.SOC 2 Type II provides assurance that security controls are operating effectively over time
  • 2.ISO 27001 certification demonstrates a comprehensive information security management system
  • 3.Certifications are necessary but not sufficient - evaluate specific AI security practices separately
  • 4.Ask for the actual audit reports not just certification logos on vendor websites
  • 5.Map certification scope to your specific use case to ensure relevant controls are covered

AI Vendor Certifications Explained: SOC 2, ISO 27001, and What They Mean

When an AI vendor claims to have "enterprise-grade security," certifications are how you verify it. But certifications can be confusing, and they don't tell the whole story. This guide demystifies the major security certifications and explains what they actually mean for your AI vendor decisions.

Executive Summary

  • Certifications demonstrate baseline security hygiene. They prove a vendor has implemented and maintains a formal security program.
  • Not all certifications are equal. SOC 2 Type II is more rigorous than Type I. ISO 27001 scope matters as much as the certification itself.
  • Certifications have gaps for AI. Traditional frameworks don't cover AI-specific risks like training data usage or prompt injection.
  • Verification is essential. Ask to see reports and certificates. Expired or limited-scope certifications provide false assurance.
  • Certifications are necessary but not sufficient. They should be one input to vendor decisions, not the only input.
  • Industry-specific certifications add context. Healthcare, finance, and education have additional relevant certifications.
  • Beyond certifications, assess directly. Supplement certifications with questionnaires and contractual protections.

Why This Matters Now

AI vendors range from mature enterprises to early-stage startups. Certifications provide a standardized way to assess security maturity, but only if you understand what they mean:

  • Informed decisions: Know what a certification actually covers
  • Appropriate weighting: Don't over- or under-rely on certifications
  • Gap identification: Understand where certifications fall short for AI
  • Verification skills: Know how to confirm certification validity

Major Security Certifications Compared

CertificationWhat It ProvesAudit FrequencyAI CoverageVerification
SOC 2 Type IControls exist at a point in timeOne-time snapshotMinimalRequest report
SOC 2 Type IIControls operated effectively over 6-12 monthsAnnualMinimalRequest report
ISO 27001Information security management system existsAnnual surveillance, 3-year recertificationMinimalVerify certificate
ISO 27701Privacy management system extensionWith ISO 27001Privacy focus, not AIVerify certificate
ISO 42001AI management system (new)TBDAI-specificEmerging
CSA STARCloud security self-assessment or auditVaries by levelCloud focusCSA registry

SOC 2: The Deep Dive

What Is SOC 2?

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is an audit framework developed by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). It evaluates an organization's controls related to:

  • Security (required): Protection against unauthorized access
  • Availability (optional): System operational and usable as agreed
  • Processing Integrity (optional): System processing is complete, valid, and timely
  • Confidentiality (optional): Information designated as confidential is protected
  • Privacy (optional): Personal information is handled appropriately

Type I vs. Type II

AspectType IType II
What's testedControl design at a point in timeControl design and operating effectiveness over time
Period coveredSingle dateTypically 6-12 months
ValueDemonstrates controls existDemonstrates controls work consistently
Red flagMature vendors should have Type IIType I only is acceptable for early-stage

Always ask for Type II. Type I is essentially a snapshot that doesn't prove controls actually work over time.

How to Review a SOC 2 Report

  1. Check the report date. Reports older than 12 months may not reflect current practices.
  2. Verify the service scope. Does it cover the specific services you'll use?
  3. Review Trust Service Categories. For AI vendors, Security and Confidentiality are essential.
  4. Look for exceptions. The auditor's opinion should be unqualified. Exceptions indicate control failures.
  5. Read management's assertions. Understand what they're claiming versus what's tested.
  6. Check complementary user entity controls. These are your responsibilities.

ISO 27001: The Deep Dive

What Is ISO 27001?

ISO/IEC 27001 is an international standard for information security management systems (ISMS). It provides a framework for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving security.

Certification Components

  • ISMS scope: What's covered (and what's not)
  • Statement of Applicability (SoA): Which of 93 controls apply
  • Risk assessment: How risks are identified and treated
  • Continuous improvement: How the system evolves

How to Evaluate ISO 27001

  1. Verify the certificate. Check with the certification body that it's valid.
  2. Review the scope. Ensure it covers the services you'll use.
  3. Request the Statement of Applicability. Understand which controls apply.
  4. Check the certification body. Use accredited bodies (UKAS, JAS-ANZ, etc.).
  5. Note the issue and expiry dates. Certificates are valid for 3 years with annual surveillance.

Scope Gotchas

A common issue: certification scope is narrower than you assume.

Example: Vendor's ISO 27001 covers "corporate headquarters IT operations" but not the cloud platform hosting your data.

Always verify: "Does your ISO 27001 scope include the specific services we're evaluating?"


ISO 27701: Privacy Extension

What Is ISO 27701?

ISO 27701 extends ISO 27001 to cover privacy information management. It addresses:

  • Privacy by design
  • Data subject rights
  • Consent management
  • Data processing records

When It Matters

Relevant when vendors process personal data. It demonstrates structured privacy management beyond basic security.

Limitation

ISO 27701 addresses privacy broadly but doesn't specifically cover AI-related privacy concerns like training data or model behavior.


ISO 42001: The AI-Specific Standard (Emerging)

What Is ISO 42001?

ISO/IEC 42001 is a new standard (published 2023) for AI management systems. It specifically addresses:

Current State

As of 2026, ISO 42001 is still being adopted. Few vendors have certification yet, but expect this to become more common.

What to Ask

"Are you pursuing ISO 42001 certification? What's your timeline?"


Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) STAR

What Is CSA STAR?

The Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk (STAR) program provides a registry of cloud provider security postures.

STAR Levels

LevelDescription
Level 1: Self-AssessmentVendor completes questionnaire (CAIQ)
Level 2: Third-Party AuditIndependent audit against CSA standards
Level 3: Continuous MonitoringOngoing automated assessment

Value

CSA STAR focuses specifically on cloud services, making it relevant for cloud-based AI platforms.


What Certifications Don't Cover

AI-Specific Gaps

Traditional certifications have blind spots for AI:

GapWhy It MattersHow to Address
Training data usageWhether your data trains their modelsDirect questioning, contractual terms
Prompt injectionProtection against AI-specific attacksAI security questionnaire
Model securityProtection of the AI model itselfTechnical assessment
Output monitoringDetecting harmful or incorrect outputsAI-specific review
Bias and fairnessWhether AI treats users equitablyEthical AI assessment

What Certifications Prove vs. Don't Prove

Certifications ProveCertifications Don't Prove
Formal security program existsSecurity is actually effective for your use case
Controls are documentedControls are appropriate for AI risks
Regular audits occurDay-to-day security culture
Baseline hygiene is in placeResponse to incidents will be adequate
Investment in securityAI-specific protections exist

Industry-Specific Certifications

IndustryRelevant CertificationsNotes
HealthcareHIPAA attestation, HITRUSTImportant if processing health data
Financial ServicesPCI-DSS, MAS complianceRequired for payment/financial data
GovernmentFedRAMP, G-CloudFor government contracts
EducationStudent privacy certificationsFor handling student data

Verification Checklist

CERTIFICATION VERIFICATION CHECKLIST

SOC 2
[ ] Report is Type II (not Type I)
[ ] Report is less than 12 months old
[ ] Scope covers services you'll use
[ ] Security and Confidentiality categories included
[ ] No significant exceptions in auditor opinion
[ ] You've reviewed the actual report (not just summary)

ISO 27001
[ ] Certificate is current (not expired)
[ ] Certification body is accredited
[ ] Scope explicitly covers relevant services
[ ] Statement of Applicability reviewed
[ ] Recent surveillance audit completed

General
[ ] Certifications verified with issuing body (not just vendor claim)
[ ] Gaps between certifications and AI needs identified
[ ] Supplementary questions prepared for AI-specific concerns

Common Failure Modes

1. Accepting certifications at face value. Verify with issuing bodies. Fake or expired certifications exist.

2. Ignoring scope limitations. A certification may not cover the services you're evaluating.

3. Treating certifications as comprehensive. They're one input, not the complete picture.

4. Over-relying on Type I SOC 2. Type I only proves controls exist, not that they work.

5. Missing AI-specific gaps. Traditional certifications don't address AI-unique risks.


Metrics to Track

MetricTargetFrequency
Vendors with current certifications100%Quarterly
Certification scope verification100%Per vendor
AI-specific gap assessments100%Per vendor
Certification expiry trackingZero lapsesMonthly

FAQ

Q: Which is better, SOC 2 or ISO 27001? A: They're complementary. SOC 2 provides more detailed audit evidence; ISO 27001 demonstrates a management system. Having both is ideal.

Q: What if a vendor has no certifications? A: Proceed with caution. Conduct deeper due diligence. Consider limiting data exposure until they mature.

Q: How do I verify an ISO 27001 certificate is real? A: Contact the certification body directly. Legitimate certificates have verifiable registration numbers.

Q: Are certifications required by PDPA? A: Not explicitly, but they demonstrate "reasonable security" as required by data protection law.

Q: What about vendor self-certifications? A: Self-certifications (like Privacy Shield declarations) have limited value compared to independent audits.


Next Steps

Certifications are one component of vendor evaluation:


Book an AI Readiness Audit

Need help evaluating AI vendor certifications and security? Our AI Readiness Audit includes comprehensive vendor assessment.

Book an AI Readiness Audit →


References

  1. AICPA. SOC 2 Reporting Framework and Trust Services Criteria.
  2. ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Information Security Management Systems.
  3. ISO/IEC 27701:2019. Privacy Information Management.
  4. ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Artificial Intelligence Management System.
  5. Cloud Security Alliance. STAR Program Overview.

Frequently Asked Questions

SOC 2 Type II indicates the vendor's security controls have been tested over time (typically 6-12 months) and found to be operating effectively. It covers security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

ISO 27001 demonstrates a comprehensive information security management system but doesn't address AI-specific risks. You should still evaluate AI security practices separately, including model security and data handling.

Yes, always request the full audit reports rather than just accepting certification claims. The reports detail the scope of assessment, any exceptions noted, and whether the controls relevant to your use case were actually tested.

References

  1. AICPA. SOC 2 Reporting Framework and Trust Services Criteria.. AICPA SOC Reporting Framework and Trust Services Criteria
  2. ISO/IEC 27001:2022. Information Security Management Systems.. ISO/IEC Information Security Management Systems (2022)
  3. ISO/IEC 27701:2019. Privacy Information Management.. ISO/IEC Privacy Information Management (2019)
  4. ISO/IEC 42001:2023. Artificial Intelligence Management System.. ISO/IEC Artificial Intelligence Management System (2023)
  5. Cloud Security Alliance. STAR Program Overview.. Cloud Security Alliance STAR Program Overview
Michael Lansdowne Hauge

Founder & Managing Partner

Founder & Managing Partner at Pertama Partners. Founder of Pertama Group.

soc2iso27001ai certificationsvendor complianceSOC 2 Type 2 AI vendorsISO 27001 AI certificationAI compliance certifications

Ready to Apply These Insights to Your Organization?

Book a complimentary AI Readiness Audit to identify opportunities specific to your context.

Book an AI Readiness Audit