Back to Insights
AI Security & Data ProtectionGuidePractitioner

AI Data Retention Policies: How Long to Keep What

January 26, 202610 min readMichael Lansdowne Hauge
For:Data Protection OfficersCompliance TeamsIT Leaders

Navigate AI data retention requirements with this practical guide. Covers training data, model outputs, logs, and compliance with PDPA and other regulations.

Tech Devops Monitoring - ai security & data protection insights

Key Takeaways

  • 1.AI data retention differs from traditional data—training data, model outputs, and logs each have different requirements
  • 2.PDPA and regional regulations require clear retention schedules with documented justification
  • 3.Balance compliance requirements with operational needs for model improvement and audit trails
  • 4.Implement automated retention policies with clear deletion verification processes
  • 5.Document your retention decisions for regulatory examination readiness

AI systems create new data retention challenges. Training data, model inputs, generated outputs, system logs—each has different retention considerations, and getting it wrong creates both compliance risk and operational problems.

This guide helps compliance professionals establish appropriate data retention policies for AI systems, balancing legal requirements, business needs, and privacy principles.


Executive Summary

  • AI creates multiple data categories with different retention requirements: training data, operational inputs, outputs, logs, and model artifacts
  • Legal retention requirements vary by jurisdiction, sector, and data type—Singapore, Malaysia, and Thailand have different frameworks
  • Over-retention creates risk: privacy exposure, storage costs, and compliance complexity
  • Under-retention creates risk: inability to audit, demonstrate compliance, or reproduce results
  • Retention policies must address AI-specific challenges: training data provenance, model versioning, output attribution
  • Deletion in AI is complex: removing data doesn't remove what models "learned" from it
  • Regular review is essential: retention policies need updating as regulations and business needs evolve

Why This Matters Now

AI data retention is becoming a compliance priority:

Regulatory evolution. Data protection authorities are examining AI-specific retention issues. Guidance is emerging; enforcement will follow.

Right to erasure complexity. PDPA rights to deletion intersect uncomfortably with AI training data. How do you delete data from a trained model?

Audit trail requirements. Demonstrating AI decision-making for regulatory, legal, or business purposes requires retaining appropriate records.

Storage cost explosion. AI systems generate enormous data volumes. Indefinite retention is unsustainable.


Definitions and Scope

AI data categories:

CategoryDescriptionRetention Considerations
Training DataData used to train or fine-tune AI modelsProvenance documentation, licensing, re-training needs
Input DataData provided to AI systems during operationPersonal data, business records, transience
Output DataResults generated by AI systemsDecision records, audit trails, IP
System LogsTechnical operation recordsSecurity, debugging, compliance
Model ArtifactsModel weights, configurations, versionsReproducibility, rollback capability
MetadataData about AI operationsAudit, monitoring, governance

Retention drivers:

  • Legal/regulatory requirements
  • Business operational needs
  • Audit and compliance purposes
  • Litigation hold requirements
  • Research and improvement needs

Policy Template: AI Data Retention Schedule

Training Data

General Principle: Retain training data for the operational life of the model plus [X years] for audit and reproduction purposes.

Data TypeMinimum RetentionMaximum RetentionLegal BasisDeletion Procedure
Proprietary training dataModel life + 2 yearsModel life + 5 yearsLegitimate interestSecure deletion with verification
Licensed third-party dataPer license termsPer license termsContractPer license terms
Personal data in trainingPer consent scopePer consent scope + legal holdsConsent/legitimate interestRight to erasure considerations
Synthetic/generated training dataModel lifeModel life + 2 yearsLegitimate interestStandard deletion

Special Considerations:

  • Document data sources and licensing for all training data
  • Maintain data lineage records separately from data itself
  • For personal data, document legal basis for training use
  • Retain data processing records even after data deletion

Input Data (Operational)

General Principle: Retain operational inputs only as long as necessary for the specified purpose, plus required audit period.

Input TypeMinimum RetentionMaximum RetentionLegal BasisDeletion Procedure
Transaction inputs (e.g., documents processed)Processing durationProcessing + 30 daysPerformance of contractAutomated deletion
Personal data inputsPurpose completionPer PDPA requirementsConsent/contract/legitimate interestUser-initiated or scheduled
Business record inputsPer business records policyPer business records policyLegal obligation/legitimate interestPer records management

Special Considerations:

  • Distinguish between transient processing and persistent storage
  • Apply data minimization—don't retain inputs that aren't needed
  • For personal data, apply shortest retention consistent with purpose

Output Data

General Principle: Retain outputs that constitute business records or support accountability; apply standard records retention.

Output TypeMinimum RetentionMaximum RetentionLegal BasisDeletion Procedure
Decision records (consequential AI decisions)7 years10 yearsLegal obligation/accountabilityPer records schedule
Generated content (reports, analysis)Per business needPer business records policyLegitimate interestStandard deletion
Automated communications90 days1 yearLegitimate interestAutomated deletion
Transient outputs (not saved)00Not retained

Special Considerations:

  • Consequential decisions require longer retention for audit/legal purposes
  • Consider output sensitivity—some outputs contain derived personal data
  • Retain sufficient context to understand output (input summary, model version)

System Logs

General Principle: Retain logs for security, debugging, and compliance purposes with defined rolling retention.

Log TypeMinimum RetentionMaximum RetentionLegal BasisDeletion Procedure
Security/access logs1 year2 yearsSecurity, legal obligationAutomated rolling deletion
Error/debug logs90 days180 daysLegitimate interestAutomated rolling deletion
Performance logs30 days90 daysLegitimate interestAutomated rolling deletion
Audit logs7 years10 yearsLegal obligationPer audit requirements

Special Considerations:

  • Security logs may be subject to extended retention during investigations
  • Debug logs containing personal data should be minimized
  • Audit logs must be tamper-evident

Model Artifacts

General Principle: Retain model versions sufficient for rollback, audit, and reproduction requirements.

Artifact TypeMinimum RetentionMaximum RetentionLegal BasisDeletion Procedure
Production model versionsDeployment life + 2 yearsDeployment life + 5 yearsAccountability/auditSecure deletion
Model configurationWith model versionWith model versionAccountabilityWith model deletion
Training records (hyperparameters, metrics)Model life + 2 yearsModel life + 5 yearsAudit/reproducibilityWith model deletion
Deprecated models2 years post-deprecation5 years post-deprecationRollback/auditScheduled deletion

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide

Phase 1: Assessment (Weeks 1-2)

Step 1: Inventory AI data

Document for each AI system:

  • What data categories exist?
  • Where is data stored?
  • What are current retention practices?
  • What legal requirements apply?

Step 2: Map legal requirements

Identify applicable retention requirements:

Singapore:

  • PDPA: Retain only as long as necessary for purpose; cease retention when no longer necessary
  • Sector-specific: Financial services (MAS requirements), healthcare, etc.
  • Business records: Companies Act requirements

Malaysia:

  • PDPA: Personal data must be destroyed when no longer necessary
  • Sector-specific requirements
  • Business records requirements

Thailand:

  • PDPA: Data retention limited to purpose necessity
  • Specific sector requirements
  • Business records requirements

Step 3: Identify business requirements

Beyond legal minimums:

  • Audit and accountability needs
  • Business operational requirements
  • Research and improvement needs
  • Litigation and regulatory preparation

Phase 2: Policy Development (Weeks 3-4)

Step 4: Define retention periods

For each data category:

  • Determine minimum legal retention
  • Assess business need beyond minimum
  • Set maximum retention
  • Document rationale

Step 5: Establish deletion procedures

For each category:

  • Define deletion trigger (time-based, event-based)
  • Specify deletion method (secure deletion, anonymization)
  • Require verification of completion
  • Document exception handling

Step 6: Address AI-specific challenges

Training data and model unlearning:

  • Acknowledge limitation: deleting training data doesn't remove learned patterns
  • Document approach: full model retraining, fine-tuning, or accepted limitation
  • Apply risk-based judgment to deletion requests

Version management:

  • Define which model versions to retain
  • Establish rollback requirements
  • Document retirement criteria

Cross-reference integrity:

  • Ensure logs, outputs, and models remain coherent
  • Document dependencies before deletion

Phase 3: Implementation (Weeks 5-8)

Step 7: Configure technical controls

Implement retention automation:

  • Automated deletion schedules
  • Retention tagging in storage systems
  • Legal hold capabilities
  • Deletion logging and verification

Step 8: Integrate with governance

Connect to broader framework:

  • Data protection impact assessments
  • AI governance approval process
  • Incident response procedures
  • Audit processes

Step 9: Train and communicate

Ensure understanding:

  • AI system owners understand retention requirements
  • IT understands technical implementation
  • Legal/compliance can respond to inquiries
  • Users understand data handling

Common Failure Modes

Keeping everything forever. Storage is cheap, but risk accumulates. Over-retention creates liability.

Deleting too quickly. Losing data needed for audit, compliance, or litigation creates different problems.

Ignoring AI-specific issues. Treating AI data like traditional data misses training data, model artifacts, and unlearning challenges.

Manual-only processes. Relying on manual deletion doesn't scale and creates gaps. Automate where possible.

Policy without enforcement. Documenting retention periods without implementing controls is compliance theater.


Checklist: AI Data Retention Implementation

□ AI data inventory completed
□ Legal retention requirements mapped by jurisdiction
□ Business retention needs documented
□ Retention periods defined for each data category
□ Deletion procedures specified
□ AI-specific challenges addressed (training data, models)
□ Technical controls configured
□ Legal hold process established
□ Exception handling defined
□ Integration with governance processes complete
□ Training provided to relevant staff
□ Policy documented and approved
□ Audit trail requirements satisfied
□ Regular review schedule established

Metrics to Track

Compliance metrics:

  • Data retained beyond policy
  • Deletion requests fulfilled within timeline
  • Legal holds properly maintained

Operational metrics:

  • Storage utilization by retention category
  • Automated deletion execution rate
  • Manual intervention requirements

Tooling Suggestions

Data lifecycle management:

  • Enterprise data management platforms
  • Cloud storage lifecycle policies
  • Records management systems

AI-specific:

  • Model registry with version management
  • Training data cataloging
  • Lineage tracking tools

Compliance:

  • Legal hold management
  • Deletion verification
  • Audit trail systems

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: How do I delete data from a trained model? A: You typically can't directly. Options: retrain without that data (expensive), use machine unlearning techniques (emerging, not mature), or document the limitation and assess risk.

Q: What if a user requests deletion of their data that was used for training? A: Document your approach in privacy notices. Options include retraining, applying unlearning techniques, or explaining limitations while stopping future use. Seek legal guidance for your jurisdiction.

Q: How long should we keep AI decision records? A: Long enough to respond to challenges. For consequential decisions (employment, credit, significant business): 7+ years. For low-stakes: shorter retention acceptable.

Q: Should we retain all model versions? A: No. Retain current production, one rollback version, and versions needed for audit/compliance. Retire the rest per policy.

Q: What about research/improvement needs? A: Legitimate, but not unlimited. Define specific improvement use cases and apply appropriate retention, anonymization, or consent-based approaches.

Q: How does this interact with right to access requests? A: Retention enables response to access requests. Ensure you can locate and produce relevant data during retention period.


Disclaimer

This guide provides general information about AI data retention considerations. It does not constitute legal advice. Specific retention requirements vary by jurisdiction, sector, and data type. Organizations should consult qualified legal counsel regarding their specific obligations under applicable laws in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and other relevant jurisdictions.


Get Retention Right

AI data retention policies balance competing pressures: legal compliance, business needs, privacy protection, and practical constraints. Getting it right requires thoughtful analysis, clear policies, and effective implementation.

Book an AI Readiness Audit to assess your AI data management practices, develop appropriate retention policies, and implement controls that satisfy compliance requirements.

[Book an AI Readiness Audit →]


References

  1. PDPC Singapore. (2024). Advisory Guidelines on Key Concepts in the PDPA.
  2. PDPA Malaysia. (2024). Personal Data Protection Standards.
  3. PDPC Thailand. (2024). Guidelines on Data Retention.
  4. Article 29 Working Party / EDPB. (2024). Guidelines on Storage Limitation.
  5. NIST. (2024). AI Risk Management Framework: Data Governance.

Frequently Asked Questions

Retain training data provenance, model versions, input/output logs, decision records, and audit trails. Specific retention periods depend on regulatory requirements and use case.

AI involves training data, model artifacts, inference logs, and outputs—each with different retention considerations. You may need data for model reproduction or audit.

Define retention schedules for each data type, implement automated deletion with verification, document decisions, and build exceptions handling for legal holds.

References

  1. PDPC Singapore. (2024). Advisory Guidelines on Key Concepts in the PDPA.. PDPC Singapore Advisory Guidelines on Key Concepts in the PDPA (2024)
  2. PDPA Malaysia. (2024). Personal Data Protection Standards.. PDPA Malaysia Personal Data Protection Standards (2024)
  3. PDPC Thailand. (2024). Guidelines on Data Retention.. PDPC Thailand Guidelines on Data Retention (2024)
  4. Article 29 Working Party / EDPB. (2024). Guidelines on Storage Limitation.. Article Working Party / EDPB Guidelines on Storage Limitation (2024)
  5. NIST. (2024). AI Risk Management Framework: Data Governance.. NIST AI Risk Management Framework Data Governance (2024)
Michael Lansdowne Hauge

Founder & Managing Partner

Founder & Managing Partner at Pertama Partners. Founder of Pertama Group.

data retentionai datacompliancepdpadata lifecycledata protectionAI data lifecycle managementdata retention compliance requirementsPDPA retention policies AIhow long to keep AI dataAI data deletion requirements

Ready to Apply These Insights to Your Organization?

Book a complimentary AI Readiness Audit to identify opportunities specific to your context.

Book an AI Readiness Audit