AI Compliance Gap Assessment

The audit covers the EU AI Act, the Singapore Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA), and applicable sector guidance such as MAS notices for financial services or health-sector data rules. We confirm the exact set in scope during the first phase so the assessment maps to the obligations that actually attach to your business.

A risk assessment scores the technical, operational, and ethical harms an AI system can cause. A compliance gap assessment specifically compares your systems and documentation against legal obligations and tells you where you breach them. Many clients run both: the risk assessment for deployment decisions, the compliance gap assessment for regulatory exposure.

You receive a prioritised gap register mapped to specific regulatory provisions, an applicability matrix showing which obligations attach to which system, a remediation roadmap ordered by risk and effort, an evidence pack for customer and auditor requests, and an EU AI Act risk-tier classification for each system.

Yes. Remediation is available as a follow-on engagement. The gap assessment is deliberately delivered first so your team sees the full, prioritised picture and can decide which gaps to remediate internally and where outside support adds the most value.

Most engagements run two to four weeks depending on the number of regulations and AI systems in scope. Scoping takes the first few days, the provision-level analysis the bulk of the time, and the prioritisation and executive readout close it out.