Back to Insights
AI Readiness & StrategyFrameworkPractitioner

How to Measure AI Maturity: A 5-Level Framework for Enterprises

October 2, 202511 min readMichael Lansdowne Hauge
For:CXOsIT LeadersStrategy LeadersDigital Transformation Leaders

Learn how to measure your organization's AI maturity using a 5-level framework. Includes dimension-by-dimension assessment guide, RACI matrix, and advancement roadmap.

Singaporean Analyst - ai readiness & strategy insights

Key Takeaways

  • 1.AI maturity progresses through five distinct levels from ad-hoc experimentation to optimized operations
  • 2.Most organizations overestimate their maturity level - honest assessment is critical for planning
  • 3.Each maturity level has specific capabilities, governance needs, and investment requirements
  • 4.Advancing too quickly without building foundations leads to failed initiatives and wasted investment
  • 5.Use maturity assessment to benchmark progress and prioritize capability development

How to Measure AI Maturity: A 5-Level Framework for Enterprises

Executive Summary

  • AI maturity measures how sophisticated your organization's AI capabilities are—distinct from AI readiness, which measures preparation to start
  • This framework defines five maturity levels: Initial, Developing, Defined, Managed, and Optimizing
  • Each level has specific characteristics across six dimensions: Strategy, Data, Technology, People, Process, and Governance
  • Organizations should assess their current level, then focus on the capabilities needed to reach the next level—not skip ahead
  • Maturity assessment enables benchmarking against peers, identifying gaps, and prioritizing investments
  • Most organizations in Southeast Asia operate at Levels 1-2; reaching Level 3 represents a significant competitive advantage
  • Annual maturity assessment helps track progress and adjust strategy

Why This Matters Now

As AI moves from experimentation to operational reality, executives need a way to answer three questions:

  1. Where are we today? Honest assessment of current capabilities
  2. Where should we be? Target state based on strategy and competitive position
  3. What's the gap? Specific capabilities to develop

A maturity framework provides the structure to answer these questions objectively. Without it, organizations rely on gut feel—often resulting in either overconfidence or unnecessary anxiety.

The pressure is real. Organizations operating at higher maturity levels demonstrate 30-50% better outcomes from AI initiatives. They ship faster, fail less expensively, and scale more effectively. Understanding where you stand—and what it takes to advance—is strategic intelligence.


AI Maturity vs. AI Readiness: A Critical Distinction

Before diving into the framework, let's clarify the relationship between maturity and readiness:

ConceptFocusQuestion It AnswersWhen to Use
AI ReadinessPreparation"Are we ready to start?"Pre-implementation
AI MaturitySophistication"How advanced are we?"Post-implementation

If you haven't deployed any AI systems, start with AI readiness assessment. If you've begun implementation and want to benchmark your capabilities, maturity assessment is the right tool.

Organizations sometimes have pockets of maturity (one team at Level 3) while the broader organization remains at Level 1. This framework can be applied at team, department, or enterprise level.


The 5-Level AI Maturity Framework

Level 1: Initial

Characteristics: Ad hoc experimentation with no coordination

At Level 1, AI activity exists but lacks structure. Individual teams experiment with tools like ChatGPT or build isolated proofs of concept. There's no organizational strategy, governance, or coordination.

DimensionLevel 1 Indicators
StrategyNo formal AI strategy; experimentation driven by individual enthusiasm
DataData siloed; quality unknown; no data governance for AI
TechnologyConsumer tools only; no enterprise AI infrastructure
PeopleAI champions isolated; no formal AI roles; skills acquired individually
ProcessNo AI development lifecycle; ad hoc deployment
GovernanceNo AI policies; no oversight; risk unconsidered

Typical behaviors:

  • Employees use ChatGPT for personal productivity without guidance
  • IT discovers AI tools in use during security audits
  • No budget specifically allocated to AI
  • "AI initiatives" are side projects for enthusiastic individuals

What success looks like: Awareness that AI exists and informal exploration is happening.


Level 2: Developing

Characteristics: Coordinated pilots with basic infrastructure

At Level 2, the organization has moved from ad hoc experimentation to deliberate pilots. There's executive awareness, some budget allocation, and initial attempts at coordination.

DimensionLevel 2 Indicators
StrategyAI mentioned in strategy discussions; 1-3 pilots underway
DataData quality issues identified; some data accessible for AI
TechnologyEnterprise AI tools evaluated or piloted; basic infrastructure in place
PeopleAI lead identified; training programs initiated; some specialized hiring
ProcessBasic pilot methodology; learning captured informally
GovernanceDraft AI policy; awareness of risks; basic vendor evaluation

Typical behaviors:

  • Executive sponsor for AI initiatives identified
  • 1-3 formal pilots running with defined success criteria
  • IT engaged in AI technology evaluation
  • Initial AI training programs offered
  • Draft AI usage policy circulated

What success looks like: Successful pilots with documented learnings and a path to scaling.


Level 3: Defined

Characteristics: Standardized practices and repeatable success

Level 3 represents a significant milestone: the organization can reliably deliver AI value. Practices are documented, roles are formalized, and AI is part of operational planning—not just innovation experiments.

DimensionLevel 3 Indicators
StrategyAI integrated into business strategy; use case portfolio managed
DataData governance for AI established; quality metrics tracked; MLOps foundations
TechnologyEnterprise AI platform in place; integrations working; scalable infrastructure
PeopleAI team established; cross-functional AI literacy; career paths defined
ProcessAI development lifecycle standardized; deployment procedures documented
GovernanceAI policy enforced; risk register maintained; compliance reviewed regularly

Typical behaviors:

  • AI governance committee meets regularly
  • Standard process for evaluating and approving AI use cases
  • Dedicated AI budget line item
  • Multiple AI systems in production
  • Documented playbook for AI project delivery
  • Regular AI training curriculum

What success looks like: Consistent, repeatable delivery of AI value with managed risk.


Level 4: Managed

Characteristics: Quantitative management and continuous improvement

At Level 4, AI performance is measured systematically. Decisions about AI investment are data-driven. The organization optimizes existing AI systems and identifies new opportunities proactively.

DimensionLevel 4 Indicators
StrategyAI central to competitive strategy; quantified business impact
DataReal-time data pipelines; automated quality monitoring; advanced analytics
TechnologyMLOps fully implemented; automated monitoring and retraining; model registry
PeopleAI Center of Excellence; specialized roles across the AI lifecycle
ProcessMetrics-driven optimization; A/B testing standard; automated deployment
GovernanceAI audit function; continuous compliance monitoring; board reporting

Typical behaviors:

  • AI ROI measured and reported at board level
  • Automated model performance monitoring
  • AI systems retrained on schedule or when drift detected
  • Cross-functional AI working groups optimize outcomes
  • AI governance dashboard with real-time metrics

What success looks like: Quantified AI value with continuous improvement mechanisms.


Level 5: Optimizing

Characteristics: AI-native organization driving industry innovation

Level 5 organizations have AI embedded in their DNA. They're not just using AI—they're advancing the state of practice. These organizations set industry standards and attract top AI talent.

DimensionLevel 5 Indicators
StrategyAI-first business model; industry thought leadership; AI R&D function
DataData products monetized; ecosystem data partnerships; real-time AI-ready
TechnologyCutting-edge capabilities; custom model development; AI infrastructure as competitive advantage
PeopleWorld-class AI team; industry reputation for AI excellence; academic partnerships
ProcessContinuous experimentation culture; fail-fast innovation; AI-augmented decision making
GovernanceEthical AI leadership; regulatory engagement; AI governance thought leadership

Typical behaviors:

  • AI is core to value proposition, not just operational efficiency
  • Organization contributes to AI research and standards
  • AI talent actively recruits to join
  • Industry looks to organization as AI reference
  • Sophisticated AI ethics and governance as differentiator

What success looks like: AI as competitive moat and source of industry leadership.


How to Assess Your Maturity Level

Step 1: Gather Evidence

For each of the six dimensions, collect evidence of current practices:

  • Documents (policies, strategies, procedures)
  • Metrics (KPIs, dashboards, reports)
  • Interviews (stakeholders across functions)
  • Observations (tools in use, behaviors)

Step 2: Rate Each Dimension

Score each dimension from 1-5 based on the indicators above. Be honest—overrating yourself defeats the purpose.

DimensionScore (1-5)Evidence
Strategy___
Data___
Technology___
People___
Process___
Governance___
Average___

Step 3: Identify Your Overall Level

Your overall maturity level is typically the lowest of your dimension scores. Why? Because maturity depends on coherence—a Level 4 strategy with Level 1 governance creates risk, not value.

Step 4: Compare to Target

Based on your industry, competitive position, and strategic priorities, determine your target maturity level. The gap between current and target drives your roadmap.


RACI Matrix: AI Maturity Governance

Clear accountability is essential for maturity advancement. Here's a RACI example for key AI maturity activities:

ActivityCEOCTO/CIOAI LeadBusiness UnitsRisk/ComplianceHR
AI strategy approvalARCCCI
Annual maturity assessmentIARCCI
Gap remediation planningIARCCC
Technology investmentARCICI
AI skills developmentICCCIR/A
AI governance oversightACRIRI
Use case prioritizationACRRCI
Risk monitoringICCIR/AI
Policy enforcementICCRAC
Board reportingARCICI

Key:

  • R = Responsible (does the work)
  • A = Accountable (final decision maker)
  • C = Consulted (provides input)
  • I = Informed (kept updated)

Common Failure Modes

1. Overestimating Maturity

Organizations often rate themselves higher than reality warrants. Having ChatGPT access doesn't make you Level 2; having one successful pilot doesn't make you Level 3.

Fix: Require evidence for each rating. "We have a governance committee" means nothing if it's never met.

2. Focusing on Technology Only

Maturity requires advancement across all six dimensions. Organizations that invest only in technology plateau quickly.

Fix: Assess all dimensions and address the lowest-scoring areas first.

3. Trying to Skip Levels

Each level builds on the previous. You can't reach Level 4 without Level 3 foundations. Attempting to skip creates capability gaps that undermine AI systems.

Fix: Focus on reaching the next level, not the ultimate destination.

4. One-Time Assessment

Maturity changes over time—ideally improving, but sometimes degrading (key people leave, priorities shift). A single assessment provides a snapshot, not a trajectory.

Fix: Assess annually and track trends.


Checklist: AI Maturity Assessment

Preparation

  • Identified assessment scope (enterprise, division, function)
  • Assembled cross-functional assessment team
  • Gathered relevant documentation and evidence
  • Scheduled stakeholder interviews
  • Defined target maturity level based on strategy

Assessment Execution

  • Rated each of six dimensions with evidence
  • Identified overall maturity level (lowest dimension)
  • Documented gaps between current and target
  • Validated findings with stakeholders
  • Identified quick wins vs. longer-term investments

Post-Assessment

  • Prioritized improvement initiatives
  • Assigned owners to each initiative (see RACI)
  • Established metrics for tracking progress
  • Scheduled follow-up assessment (6-12 months)
  • Communicated findings and roadmap to leadership

Metrics to Track

MetricWhat It MeasuresFrequency
Overall maturity scoreAggregate across dimensionsAnnual
Dimension scoresDetailed capability viewAnnual
Gap closure rateProgress on identified improvementsQuarterly
AI project success rateOutcome of AI initiativesPer project
Time to deployEfficiency of AI developmentPer project
AI ROIBusiness value generatedAnnual

Frequently Asked Questions


Next Steps

Understanding your maturity level is the starting point. The value comes from closing the gap between current state and strategic target.

If you're uncertain about your current level or how to advance, a formal assessment provides clarity and actionable recommendations.

Book an AI Readiness Audit with Pertama Partners to benchmark your maturity and develop a practical advancement roadmap.


References

  1. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute. "Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)." Framework reference.
  2. McKinsey & Company. "AI Maturity Framework." 2023.
  3. MIT Sloan Management Review. "Winning with AI." Research Report, 2024.
  4. Singapore Infocomm Media Development Authority. "Model AI Governance Framework." Second Edition, 2020.

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your strategy and industry. For most enterprises in Southeast Asia, Level 3 (Defined) represents a strong competitive position. Level 4-5 is typically only necessary if AI is central to your value proposition.

References

  1. Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI).. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute Framework reference
  2. AI Maturity Framework.. McKinsey & Company (2023)
  3. Winning with AI.. MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report (2024)
  4. Model AI Governance Framework.. Singapore Infocomm Media Development Authority Second Edition (2020)
Michael Lansdowne Hauge

Founder & Managing Partner

Founder & Managing Partner at Pertama Partners. Founder of Pertama Group.

AI MaturityAI StrategyEnterprise AIGovernanceFrameworkAI maturity model for enterprisesmeasuring AI capability maturityenterprise AI maturity framework

Ready to Apply These Insights to Your Organization?

Book a complimentary AI Readiness Audit to identify opportunities specific to your context.

Book an AI Readiness Audit