How to Measure AI Maturity: A 5-Level Framework for Enterprises
Executive Summary
- AI maturity measures how sophisticated your organization's AI capabilities are—distinct from AI readiness, which measures preparation to start
- This framework defines five maturity levels: Initial, Developing, Defined, Managed, and Optimizing
- Each level has specific characteristics across six dimensions: Strategy, Data, Technology, People, Process, and Governance
- Organizations should assess their current level, then focus on the capabilities needed to reach the next level—not skip ahead
- Maturity assessment enables benchmarking against peers, identifying gaps, and prioritizing investments
- Most organizations in Southeast Asia operate at Levels 1-2; reaching Level 3 represents a significant competitive advantage
- Annual maturity assessment helps track progress and adjust strategy
Why This Matters Now
As AI moves from experimentation to operational reality, executives need a way to answer three questions:
- Where are we today? Honest assessment of current capabilities
- Where should we be? Target state based on strategy and competitive position
- What's the gap? Specific capabilities to develop
A maturity framework provides the structure to answer these questions objectively. Without it, organizations rely on gut feel—often resulting in either overconfidence or unnecessary anxiety.
The pressure is real. Organizations operating at higher maturity levels demonstrate 30-50% better outcomes from AI initiatives. They ship faster, fail less expensively, and scale more effectively. Understanding where you stand—and what it takes to advance—is strategic intelligence.
AI Maturity vs. AI Readiness: A Critical Distinction
Before diving into the framework, let's clarify the relationship between maturity and readiness:
| Concept | Focus | Question It Answers | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Readiness | Preparation | "Are we ready to start?" | Pre-implementation |
| AI Maturity | Sophistication | "How advanced are we?" | Post-implementation |
If you haven't deployed any AI systems, start with AI readiness assessment. If you've begun implementation and want to benchmark your capabilities, maturity assessment is the right tool.
Organizations sometimes have pockets of maturity (one team at Level 3) while the broader organization remains at Level 1. This framework can be applied at team, department, or enterprise level.
The 5-Level AI Maturity Framework
Level 1: Initial
Characteristics: Ad hoc experimentation with no coordination
At Level 1, AI activity exists but lacks structure. Individual teams experiment with tools like ChatGPT or build isolated proofs of concept. There's no organizational strategy, governance, or coordination.
| Dimension | Level 1 Indicators |
|---|---|
| Strategy | No formal AI strategy; experimentation driven by individual enthusiasm |
| Data | Data siloed; quality unknown; no data governance for AI |
| Technology | Consumer tools only; no enterprise AI infrastructure |
| People | AI champions isolated; no formal AI roles; skills acquired individually |
| Process | No AI development lifecycle; ad hoc deployment |
| Governance | No AI policies; no oversight; risk unconsidered |
Typical behaviors:
- Employees use ChatGPT for personal productivity without guidance
- IT discovers AI tools in use during security audits
- No budget specifically allocated to AI
- "AI initiatives" are side projects for enthusiastic individuals
What success looks like: Awareness that AI exists and informal exploration is happening.
Level 2: Developing
Characteristics: Coordinated pilots with basic infrastructure
At Level 2, the organization has moved from ad hoc experimentation to deliberate pilots. There's executive awareness, some budget allocation, and initial attempts at coordination.
| Dimension | Level 2 Indicators |
|---|---|
| Strategy | AI mentioned in strategy discussions; 1-3 pilots underway |
| Data | Data quality issues identified; some data accessible for AI |
| Technology | Enterprise AI tools evaluated or piloted; basic infrastructure in place |
| People | AI lead identified; training programs initiated; some specialized hiring |
| Process | Basic pilot methodology; learning captured informally |
| Governance | Draft AI policy; awareness of risks; basic vendor evaluation |
Typical behaviors:
- Executive sponsor for AI initiatives identified
- 1-3 formal pilots running with defined success criteria
- IT engaged in AI technology evaluation
- Initial AI training programs offered
- Draft AI usage policy circulated
What success looks like: Successful pilots with documented learnings and a path to scaling.
Level 3: Defined
Characteristics: Standardized practices and repeatable success
Level 3 represents a significant milestone: the organization can reliably deliver AI value. Practices are documented, roles are formalized, and AI is part of operational planning—not just innovation experiments.
| Dimension | Level 3 Indicators |
|---|---|
| Strategy | AI integrated into business strategy; use case portfolio managed |
| Data | Data governance for AI established; quality metrics tracked; MLOps foundations |
| Technology | Enterprise AI platform in place; integrations working; scalable infrastructure |
| People | AI team established; cross-functional AI literacy; career paths defined |
| Process | AI development lifecycle standardized; deployment procedures documented |
| Governance | AI policy enforced; risk register maintained; compliance reviewed regularly |
Typical behaviors:
- AI governance committee meets regularly
- Standard process for evaluating and approving AI use cases
- Dedicated AI budget line item
- Multiple AI systems in production
- Documented playbook for AI project delivery
- Regular AI training curriculum
What success looks like: Consistent, repeatable delivery of AI value with managed risk.
Level 4: Managed
Characteristics: Quantitative management and continuous improvement
At Level 4, AI performance is measured systematically. Decisions about AI investment are data-driven. The organization optimizes existing AI systems and identifies new opportunities proactively.
| Dimension | Level 4 Indicators |
|---|---|
| Strategy | AI central to competitive strategy; quantified business impact |
| Data | Real-time data pipelines; automated quality monitoring; advanced analytics |
| Technology | MLOps fully implemented; automated monitoring and retraining; model registry |
| People | AI Center of Excellence; specialized roles across the AI lifecycle |
| Process | Metrics-driven optimization; A/B testing standard; automated deployment |
| Governance | AI audit function; continuous compliance monitoring; board reporting |
Typical behaviors:
- AI ROI measured and reported at board level
- Automated model performance monitoring
- AI systems retrained on schedule or when drift detected
- Cross-functional AI working groups optimize outcomes
- AI governance dashboard with real-time metrics
What success looks like: Quantified AI value with continuous improvement mechanisms.
Level 5: Optimizing
Characteristics: AI-native organization driving industry innovation
Level 5 organizations have AI embedded in their DNA. They're not just using AI—they're advancing the state of practice. These organizations set industry standards and attract top AI talent.
| Dimension | Level 5 Indicators |
|---|---|
| Strategy | AI-first business model; industry thought leadership; AI R&D function |
| Data | Data products monetized; ecosystem data partnerships; real-time AI-ready |
| Technology | Cutting-edge capabilities; custom model development; AI infrastructure as competitive advantage |
| People | World-class AI team; industry reputation for AI excellence; academic partnerships |
| Process | Continuous experimentation culture; fail-fast innovation; AI-augmented decision making |
| Governance | Ethical AI leadership; regulatory engagement; AI governance thought leadership |
Typical behaviors:
- AI is core to value proposition, not just operational efficiency
- Organization contributes to AI research and standards
- AI talent actively recruits to join
- Industry looks to organization as AI reference
- Sophisticated AI ethics and governance as differentiator
What success looks like: AI as competitive moat and source of industry leadership.
How to Assess Your Maturity Level
Step 1: Gather Evidence
For each of the six dimensions, collect evidence of current practices:
- Documents (policies, strategies, procedures)
- Metrics (KPIs, dashboards, reports)
- Interviews (stakeholders across functions)
- Observations (tools in use, behaviors)
Step 2: Rate Each Dimension
Score each dimension from 1-5 based on the indicators above. Be honest—overrating yourself defeats the purpose.
| Dimension | Score (1-5) | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Strategy | ___ | |
| Data | ___ | |
| Technology | ___ | |
| People | ___ | |
| Process | ___ | |
| Governance | ___ | |
| Average | ___ |
Step 3: Identify Your Overall Level
Your overall maturity level is typically the lowest of your dimension scores. Why? Because maturity depends on coherence—a Level 4 strategy with Level 1 governance creates risk, not value.
Step 4: Compare to Target
Based on your industry, competitive position, and strategic priorities, determine your target maturity level. The gap between current and target drives your roadmap.
RACI Matrix: AI Maturity Governance
Clear accountability is essential for maturity advancement. Here's a RACI example for key AI maturity activities:
| Activity | CEO | CTO/CIO | AI Lead | Business Units | Risk/Compliance | HR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI strategy approval | A | R | C | C | C | I |
| Annual maturity assessment | I | A | R | C | C | I |
| Gap remediation planning | I | A | R | C | C | C |
| Technology investment | A | R | C | I | C | I |
| AI skills development | I | C | C | C | I | R/A |
| AI governance oversight | A | C | R | I | R | I |
| Use case prioritization | A | C | R | R | C | I |
| Risk monitoring | I | C | C | I | R/A | I |
| Policy enforcement | I | C | C | R | A | C |
| Board reporting | A | R | C | I | C | I |
Key:
- R = Responsible (does the work)
- A = Accountable (final decision maker)
- C = Consulted (provides input)
- I = Informed (kept updated)
Common Failure Modes
1. Overestimating Maturity
Organizations often rate themselves higher than reality warrants. Having ChatGPT access doesn't make you Level 2; having one successful pilot doesn't make you Level 3.
Fix: Require evidence for each rating. "We have a governance committee" means nothing if it's never met.
2. Focusing on Technology Only
Maturity requires advancement across all six dimensions. Organizations that invest only in technology plateau quickly.
Fix: Assess all dimensions and address the lowest-scoring areas first.
3. Trying to Skip Levels
Each level builds on the previous. You can't reach Level 4 without Level 3 foundations. Attempting to skip creates capability gaps that undermine AI systems.
Fix: Focus on reaching the next level, not the ultimate destination.
4. One-Time Assessment
Maturity changes over time—ideally improving, but sometimes degrading (key people leave, priorities shift). A single assessment provides a snapshot, not a trajectory.
Fix: Assess annually and track trends.
Checklist: AI Maturity Assessment
Preparation
- Identified assessment scope (enterprise, division, function)
- Assembled cross-functional assessment team
- Gathered relevant documentation and evidence
- Scheduled stakeholder interviews
- Defined target maturity level based on strategy
Assessment Execution
- Rated each of six dimensions with evidence
- Identified overall maturity level (lowest dimension)
- Documented gaps between current and target
- Validated findings with stakeholders
- Identified quick wins vs. longer-term investments
Post-Assessment
- Prioritized improvement initiatives
- Assigned owners to each initiative (see RACI)
- Established metrics for tracking progress
- Scheduled follow-up assessment (6-12 months)
- Communicated findings and roadmap to leadership
Metrics to Track
| Metric | What It Measures | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Overall maturity score | Aggregate across dimensions | Annual |
| Dimension scores | Detailed capability view | Annual |
| Gap closure rate | Progress on identified improvements | Quarterly |
| AI project success rate | Outcome of AI initiatives | Per project |
| Time to deploy | Efficiency of AI development | Per project |
| AI ROI | Business value generated | Annual |
Frequently Asked Questions
Next Steps
Understanding your maturity level is the starting point. The value comes from closing the gap between current state and strategic target.
If you're uncertain about your current level or how to advance, a formal assessment provides clarity and actionable recommendations.
Book an AI Readiness Audit with Pertama Partners to benchmark your maturity and develop a practical advancement roadmap.
References
- Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute. "Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI)." Framework reference.
- McKinsey & Company. "AI Maturity Framework." 2023.
- MIT Sloan Management Review. "Winning with AI." Research Report, 2024.
- Singapore Infocomm Media Development Authority. "Model AI Governance Framework." Second Edition, 2020.
Related Reading
- What Is an AI Readiness Assessment? A Complete Guide
- AI Readiness Checklist: 25 Questions
- How to Prevent AI Data Leakage
Frequently Asked Questions
It depends on your strategy and industry. For most enterprises in Southeast Asia, Level 3 (Defined) represents a strong competitive position. Level 4-5 is typically only necessary if AI is central to your value proposition.
References
- Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI).. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute Framework reference
- AI Maturity Framework.. McKinsey & Company (2023)
- Winning with AI.. MIT Sloan Management Review Research Report (2024)
- Model AI Governance Framework.. Singapore Infocomm Media Development Authority Second Edition (2020)

