AI Skills Framework: Defining Competencies for Your Organization
"Train everyone on AI" sounds straightforward until you ask: Train on what, exactly? A CEO's AI needs differ from a data analyst's. A customer service rep needs different skills than a procurement manager.
This guide helps HR and L&D leaders build an AI skills framework—a structured approach to defining, assessing, and developing AI competencies across different roles in your organization.
Executive Summary
- Generic "AI training" wastes resources—different roles need different competencies at different depth levels
- AI skills exist on a spectrum from foundational awareness to technical expertise; most roles need awareness and application, not expertise
- Job families require tailored competency profiles—executive, operational, analytical, and technical roles have distinct needs
- Assessment before training identifies actual gaps rather than assumed ones
- Skills frameworks enable strategic workforce planning by identifying capability gaps and development priorities
- Progression paths retain talent by showing how AI skills connect to career advancement
- Continuous updating is essential—AI capabilities evolve faster than traditional skill domains
For related guidance on training program design, see (/insights/designing-ai-training-program-framework-ld-leaders). For needs assessment, see (/insights/ai-training-needs-assessment). For AI literacy training, see (/insights/ai-literacy-training).
RACI Example: AI Skills Framework Implementation
| Activity | HR/L&D | Department Heads | IT/AI Team | Executive Sponsor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Define framework structure | R/A | C | C | I |
| Identify job families | R | A | C | I |
| Define competency domains | R | C | A | I |
| Map competencies to roles | R | A | C | I |
| Validate profiles | R | A | C | A |
| Design assessment approach | A | I | C | I |
| Conduct assessments | R | A | I | I |
| Analyze gaps | R/A | I | C | I |
| Develop training plan | R/A | C | C | A |
| Deliver training | R | I | C | I |
| Measure effectiveness | R/A | C | I | I |
R = Responsible, A = Accountable, C = Consulted, I = Informed
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
Phase 1: Design Framework Structure (Weeks 1-2)
Step 1: Define proficiency levels
Most frameworks use 3-5 levels. A practical three-tier model:
| Level | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Awareness | Understands what AI is, its capabilities and limitations, organizational policies. Can identify when AI might apply to a problem. |
| 2 | Application | Can effectively use AI tools relevant to their role. Understands how to prompt, evaluate outputs, and integrate AI into workflows. |
| 3 | Expertise | Can design AI solutions, evaluate vendors, train others, or develop AI applications. Deep technical or strategic knowledge. |
Step 2: Identify job families
Group roles by AI skill requirements, not org chart structure:
| Job Family | Example Roles | Typical Target Level |
|---|---|---|
| Executive/Leadership | CEO, CFO, Department Heads | Awareness + Strategic |
| Operational | Customer Service, Admin, Operations | Awareness + Application |
| Analytical | Finance Analysts, Marketers, Researchers | Application + Specialized |
| Technical | IT, Developers, Data Teams | Application + Expertise |
| Risk/Compliance | Legal, Compliance, Audit | Awareness + Governance Focus |
Step 3: Define competency domains
Core AI competency areas for most organizations:
- AI Fundamentals (what AI is, types, capabilities, limitations)
- AI Application (prompting, output evaluation, workflow integration)
- AI Ethics and Governance (bias, privacy, policies, responsible use)
- AI Strategy (business case, vendor evaluation, risk assessment) - for leaders
- AI Technical (architecture, deployment, monitoring) - for specialists
Common Failure Modes
One-size-fits-all training. Executives sitting through prompt engineering workshops. Analysts taking AI strategy courses. Match training to actual role needs.
Assessment without development. Identifying gaps but not providing pathways to close them. Skills frameworks must connect to learning resources.
Over-engineering levels. Ten proficiency levels with subtle distinctions are unmanageable. Three to five levels is practical.
Ignoring business context. Generic AI competencies that don't connect to your specific tools, processes, and policies. Customize for relevance.
Set-and-forget. AI capabilities changed dramatically from 2023 to 2024, and will continue evolving. Build in update mechanisms.
Checklist: AI Skills Framework Development
□ Defined 3-5 clear proficiency levels
□ Identified job families based on skill requirements
□ Defined 4-6 competency domains covering key areas
□ Mapped required competency levels to each job family
□ Validated profiles with department leaders and performers
□ Designed skills assessment approach
□ Conducted baseline assessment
□ Analyzed gaps by job family and priority
□ Designed learning pathways with progression criteria
□ Selected delivery methods for each competency level
□ Created timeline for rollout by priority group
□ Established RACI for ongoing maintenance
□ Defined update cadence (quarterly/semi-annual/annual)
□ Connected framework to career development processes
□ Communicated framework to managers and employees
Frequently Asked Questions
Build AI-Ready Teams
An AI skills framework transforms vague training initiatives into strategic capability building. It shows employees how to stay relevant, helps leaders allocate training investment, and prepares your organization for AI-enabled competition.
Book an AI Readiness Audit to assess your current AI capabilities, identify priority skill gaps, and design a skills framework tailored to your organization.
References
- World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023.
- LinkedIn. (2024). Workplace Learning Report.
- Deloitte. (2024). Skills-Based Organization: A New Operating Model.
- McKinsey Global Institute. (2023). Skill Shift: Automation and the Future of the Workforce.
Frequently Asked Questions
Initial framework: 6-10 weeks. Assessment and baseline: 4-6 weeks additional. Full program launch: 3-6 months total for meaningful rollout.
References
- World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of Jobs Report 2023.. World Economic Forum Future of Jobs Report (2023)
- LinkedIn. (2024). Workplace Learning Report.. LinkedIn Workplace Learning Report (2024)
- Deloitte. (2024). Skills-Based Organi. Deloitte Skills-Based Organi (2024)

