Creating an AI Roadmap: From Vision to 18-Month Implementation Plan
Executive Summary
- An AI roadmap translates strategy into a time-bound plan with specific milestones, dependencies, and resource allocations
- The 18-month horizon balances long enough for meaningful progress with short enough to maintain accountability
- Effective roadmaps include three phases: Foundation (months 1-6), Build (months 7-12), and Scale (months 13-18)
- Each phase has defined objectives, deliverables, success criteria, and decision gates
- Roadmaps must be living documents, reviewed quarterly and adjusted based on learning
- The best roadmaps balance ambition with realism—they're achievable but stretch capability
- Roadmap creation is a team exercise requiring input from business, technology, and operations
Why This Matters Now
Strategy provides direction. A roadmap provides a path.
Many organizations have AI strategies that never translate to action. The gap isn't commitment—it's specificity. "We will become an AI-enabled organization" is a vision. A roadmap specifies what happens in Q1, what capabilities must be in place by month 6, and what success looks like at month 18.
Without a roadmap:
- Teams pursue initiatives without coordination
- Resources aren't allocated to the right priorities
- Progress isn't measurable
- Leadership can't track execution against commitments
The 18-month horizon is deliberate. Shorter horizons don't allow for meaningful AI capability building. Longer horizons become speculative. Eighteen months provides enough time to demonstrate value while maintaining accountability.
AI Roadmap vs. AI Strategy
| Element | AI Strategy | AI Roadmap |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Direction and priorities | Execution plan |
| Time horizon | 2-3 years | 12-18 months |
| Detail level | What and why | How and when |
| Update frequency | Annually | Quarterly |
| Primary audience | Leadership and board | Execution teams |
Strategy answers "What should we do?" Roadmap answers "When and how will we do it?"
If you haven't developed your AI strategy, start there. Roadmapping without strategy produces activity without direction.
The 18-Month Roadmap Structure
Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-6)
Objective: Establish the capabilities necessary for sustainable AI deployment.
Foundation isn't glamorous, but it determines everything that follows. Organizations that rush past foundation work face repeated remediation later.
Key Workstreams:
| Workstream | Deliverables | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Data Foundation | Data inventory, quality assessment, governance framework | Key data sources cataloged, quality baseline established |
| Infrastructure | Cloud environment, security controls, integration architecture | Environment provisioned, security approved |
| Governance | AI policy, risk framework, decision-making structure | Policy approved, committee operational |
| Skills | Training program launch, key hires initiated | 50% of target audience trained on AI fundamentals |
| Pilot Selection | Use cases prioritized, pilot plans developed | 2-3 pilots approved and resourced |
Foundation Phase Milestones:
- Month 2: AI policy draft completed
- Month 3: Data governance framework approved
- Month 4: First pilot begins
- Month 6: Foundation phase review and decision gate
Decision Gate Questions (Month 6):
- Is our data foundation sufficient for planned pilots?
- Do we have the governance structure to manage AI risk?
- Are pilots on track? What have we learned?
- Should we proceed to Build phase as planned or extend Foundation?
Phase 2: Build (Months 7-12)
Objective: Demonstrate AI value through successful pilots and initial production deployments.
Build phase is where theory becomes practice. The focus is on learning through doing—understanding what works in your specific context.
Key Workstreams:
| Workstream | Deliverables | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Pilot Execution | Pilots completed, results measured, learnings documented | 2+ pilots deliver measurable value |
| Production Deployment | First AI system in production use | System live, users trained, monitoring active |
| Process Development | AI development lifecycle documented, repeatable process | Second pilot follows documented process |
| Capability Building | Additional training, specialized hires, vendor partnerships | Technical capability sufficient for planned scale |
| Governance Maturation | risk register populated, board reporting established | governance committee reviews production systems |
Build Phase Milestones:
- Month 8: First pilot results available
- Month 9: First production deployment decision
- Month 10: Second pilot begins
- Month 12: Build phase review and decision gate
Decision Gate Questions (Month 12):
- Have pilots demonstrated expected value?
- Are we ready to scale successful approaches?
- What capability gaps remain?
- What adjustments are needed for Scale phase?
Phase 3: Scale (Months 13-18)
Objective: Expand proven AI approaches across the organization and establish sustainable operating model.
Scale phase multiplies success. It's not about starting new experiments—it's about extending what works.
Key Workstreams:
| Workstream | Deliverables | Success Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment Expansion | Successful pilots scaled to broader use | 3+ AI systems in production |
| Operating Model | AI Center of Excellence or embedded model operational | Clear ownership, processes, and accountability |
| ROI Realization | Business value measured and reported | Documented ROI meets or exceeds projections |
| Next Horizon Planning | Year 2 roadmap developed | Strategy refresh and next 18-month plan approved |
| Continuous Improvement | Optimization of deployed systems, lessons learned | Performance metrics improving quarter over quarter |
Scale Phase Milestones:
- Month 14: Second production deployment
- Month 15: Year 1 ROI assessment
- Month 16: Year 2 strategy and roadmap drafted
- Month 18: Roadmap completion review
Decision Gate Questions (Month 18):
- What business value has been created?
- What capabilities have we built?
- What works? What doesn't?
- What should the next 18 months focus on?
SOP: Quarterly Roadmap Review
Roadmaps drift without disciplined review. This Standard Operating Procedure ensures roadmaps remain relevant and accountable.
Purpose
Quarterly review ensures roadmap alignment with strategy, tracks progress against milestones, and enables course corrections.
Frequency
Quarterly (aligned with business planning cycle)
Participants
- AI/Digital Leader (Chair)
- Executive Sponsor
- IT Leadership
- Business Unit Representatives
- Risk/Compliance Representative
- Finance Representative
Pre-Meeting Preparation (Owner: AI/Digital Leader)
One week before meeting:
- Collect status updates from all workstream leads
- Compile milestone progress (completed, in progress, at risk, not started)
- Prepare variance analysis (actual vs. planned)
- Document emerging risks and issues
- Gather budget status (actual vs. planned spend)
- Prepare draft roadmap adjustments for discussion
Meeting Agenda (90 minutes)
| Time | Topic | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00 | Strategic context update | Executive Sponsor |
| 0:10 | Milestone review | AI/Digital Leader |
| 0:30 | Variance analysis and root causes | AI/Digital Leader |
| 0:45 | Risk and issue discussion | All |
| 1:00 | Budget review | Finance |
| 1:10 | Proposed roadmap adjustments | AI/Digital Leader |
| 1:20 | Decision and action items | Chair |
Decision Types
| Decision | Authority | Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Minor timeline adjustment (<4 weeks) | AI/Digital Leader | Documented rationale |
| Milestone change or addition | Steering Committee | Majority approval |
| Scope change (add/remove workstream) | Executive Sponsor | Business case required |
| Budget reallocation (>10%) | Executive Sponsor + Finance | Approval required |
| Phase gate decision | Steering Committee | Defined criteria met |
Post-Meeting Actions (Owner: AI/Digital Leader)
Within one week:
- Distribute meeting notes and decisions
- Update roadmap document with approved changes
- Communicate adjustments to affected teams
- Update risk register
- Schedule follow-up on action items
Documentation
Maintain quarterly review records including:
- Meeting attendance
- Milestone status at time of review
- Decisions made
- Roadmap changes approved
- Action items and owners
Roadmap Template
Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-6)
| Month | Data | Infrastructure | Governance | Skills | Pilots |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Data inventory begins | Cloud assessment | Policy drafting | Training needs assessment | Use case shortlisting |
| 2 | Quality assessment | Environment design | Policy review | Training program design | Pilot selection |
| 3 | Governance framework | Environment build | Policy approval | Training pilot | Pilot planning |
| 4 | Data quality remediation | Integration architecture | Committee formation | Training rollout | Pilot 1 kickoff |
| 5 | Continued remediation | Security implementation | First committee meeting | Continued training | Pilot 1 execution |
| 6 | Foundation review | Environment operational | Phase gate review | Training milestone | Pilot 1 results |
Phase 2: Build (Months 7-12)
| Month | Pilots | Production | Process | Capability | Governance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Pilot 1 wrap-up | Production planning | Process documentation | Advanced training | Risk register setup |
| 8 | Pilot 2 kickoff | Deployment prep | Process review | Specialized hiring | Board report drafted |
| 9 | Pilot 2 execution | First deployment | Process refinement | Vendor evaluation | First board report |
| 10 | Pilot 3 kickoff | Monitoring setup | Process training | Partnership exploration | Policy review |
| 11 | Pilot 3 execution | Optimization | Process adoption | Capability assessment | Compliance review |
| 12 | Build phase review | Production stable | Process documented | Capability gaps identified | Phase gate review |
Phase 3: Scale (Months 13-18)
| Month | Expansion | Operating Model | ROI | Planning | Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Second deployment planning | Model design | ROI tracking setup | Retrospective | Optimization begins |
| 14 | Second deployment | Model piloting | Q1 ROI analysis | Lessons learned | Performance review |
| 15 | Third deployment planning | Model refinement | Year 1 ROI | Strategy refresh | Metrics analysis |
| 16 | Third deployment | Model operational | ROI reporting | Year 2 roadmap draft | Continuous improvement |
| 17 | Expansion assessment | Model optimization | Value communication | Roadmap review | System optimization |
| 18 | Roadmap completion | Model mature | Final Year 1 report | Year 2 approval | Improvement roadmap |
Common Failure Modes
1. Overloading the Roadmap
Attempting too many initiatives simultaneously dilutes focus and exhausts resources.
Fix: Limit active workstreams. Two major initiatives executing well beats five struggling.
2. Ignoring Dependencies
AI initiatives have dependencies—on data, on infrastructure, on skills. Ignoring them creates bottlenecks.
Fix: Map dependencies explicitly. Don't schedule work that depends on incomplete prerequisites.
3. Fixed Thinking
Treating the roadmap as immutable when circumstances change.
Fix: Quarterly reviews with genuine authority to adjust. The roadmap serves the strategy, not the other way around.
4. Milestone Without Meaning
Milestones that don't represent genuine progress ("complete documentation") rather than outcomes ("pilot delivers 20% efficiency improvement").
Fix: Define milestones in terms of outcomes, not activities.
5. Disconnection from Budget
Roadmap plans without corresponding budget allocation.
Fix: Every roadmap element must have allocated resources. Unfunded initiatives are wishes, not plans.
Checklist: AI Roadmap Development
Preparation
- AI strategy approved and available
- Executive sponsor confirmed
- Roadmap development team identified
- Current state assessment completed
- Resource constraints understood
Phase Design
- Three phases defined with clear objectives
- Workstreams identified for each phase
- Milestones defined as outcomes, not activities
- Dependencies mapped between workstreams
- Decision gates defined with criteria
Resource Alignment
- Budget allocated to each phase
- People resources assigned or planned
- Technology requirements specified
- External support needs identified
Governance
- Quarterly review process established
- Decision authority defined
- Escalation path clear
- Reporting cadence set
Metrics to Track
| Metric | What It Measures | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Milestone completion rate | % of milestones met on time | Monthly |
| Budget variance | Actual vs. planned spend | Monthly |
| Scope changes | Number and impact of changes | Quarterly |
| Decision gate passage | Whether criteria met at gates | Per gate |
| Business value delivered | ROI of deployed initiatives | Quarterly |
Frequently Asked Questions
Next Steps
A roadmap transforms AI ambition into executable plans. It creates accountability, enables tracking, and provides a structure for learning and adjustment.
If you have a strategy but lack a concrete implementation plan, roadmap development is your next step.
Book an AI Readiness Audit with Pertama Partners to develop a roadmap grounded in your specific context, capabilities, and constraints.
Related Reading
- Building Your First AI Strategy
- 7 AI Strategy Mistakes That Derail Implementation
- AI Investment Prioritization: Allocating Budget for Maximum Impact
Frequently Asked Questions
Eighteen months balances ambition with accountability. Shorter horizons don't allow for meaningful capability building. Longer horizons become speculative and lose urgency.

