Back to Insights
AI Readiness & StrategyPlaybookPractitioner

Creating an AI Roadmap: From Vision to 18-Month Implementation Plan

October 3, 202512 min readMichael Lansdowne Hauge
For:CXOsIT LeadersStrategy LeadersProgram Managers

Learn how to create an 18-month AI roadmap with this phased framework. Includes template, quarterly review SOP, and milestone planning guidance.

Muslim Woman Consultant Hijab - ai readiness & strategy insights

Key Takeaways

  • 1.An 18-month AI roadmap balances quick wins with strategic capability building
  • 2.Phase implementation into foundation, pilot, scale, and optimization stages
  • 3.Define clear success metrics and milestones for each roadmap phase
  • 4.Build governance and change management into the roadmap from the start
  • 5.Review and adjust the roadmap quarterly as you learn from implementation

Creating an AI Roadmap: From Vision to 18-Month Implementation Plan

Executive Summary

  • An AI roadmap translates strategy into a time-bound plan with specific milestones, dependencies, and resource allocations
  • The 18-month horizon balances long enough for meaningful progress with short enough to maintain accountability
  • Effective roadmaps include three phases: Foundation (months 1-6), Build (months 7-12), and Scale (months 13-18)
  • Each phase has defined objectives, deliverables, success criteria, and decision gates
  • Roadmaps must be living documents, reviewed quarterly and adjusted based on learning
  • The best roadmaps balance ambition with realism—they're achievable but stretch capability
  • Roadmap creation is a team exercise requiring input from business, technology, and operations

Why This Matters Now

Strategy provides direction. A roadmap provides a path.

Many organizations have AI strategies that never translate to action. The gap isn't commitment—it's specificity. "We will become an AI-enabled organization" is a vision. A roadmap specifies what happens in Q1, what capabilities must be in place by month 6, and what success looks like at month 18.

Without a roadmap:

  • Teams pursue initiatives without coordination
  • Resources aren't allocated to the right priorities
  • Progress isn't measurable
  • Leadership can't track execution against commitments

The 18-month horizon is deliberate. Shorter horizons don't allow for meaningful AI capability building. Longer horizons become speculative. Eighteen months provides enough time to demonstrate value while maintaining accountability.


AI Roadmap vs. AI Strategy

ElementAI StrategyAI Roadmap
FocusDirection and prioritiesExecution plan
Time horizon2-3 years12-18 months
Detail levelWhat and whyHow and when
Update frequencyAnnuallyQuarterly
Primary audienceLeadership and boardExecution teams

Strategy answers "What should we do?" Roadmap answers "When and how will we do it?"

If you haven't developed your AI strategy, start there. Roadmapping without strategy produces activity without direction.


The 18-Month Roadmap Structure

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-6)

Objective: Establish the capabilities necessary for sustainable AI deployment.

Foundation isn't glamorous, but it determines everything that follows. Organizations that rush past foundation work face repeated remediation later.

Key Workstreams:

WorkstreamDeliverablesSuccess Criteria
Data FoundationData inventory, quality assessment, governance frameworkKey data sources cataloged, quality baseline established
InfrastructureCloud environment, security controls, integration architectureEnvironment provisioned, security approved
GovernanceAI policy, risk framework, decision-making structurePolicy approved, committee operational
SkillsTraining program launch, key hires initiated50% of target audience trained on AI fundamentals
Pilot SelectionUse cases prioritized, pilot plans developed2-3 pilots approved and resourced

Foundation Phase Milestones:

  • Month 2: AI policy draft completed
  • Month 3: Data governance framework approved
  • Month 4: First pilot begins
  • Month 6: Foundation phase review and decision gate

Decision Gate Questions (Month 6):

  • Is our data foundation sufficient for planned pilots?
  • Do we have the governance structure to manage AI risk?
  • Are pilots on track? What have we learned?
  • Should we proceed to Build phase as planned or extend Foundation?

Phase 2: Build (Months 7-12)

Objective: Demonstrate AI value through successful pilots and initial production deployments.

Build phase is where theory becomes practice. The focus is on learning through doing—understanding what works in your specific context.

Key Workstreams:

WorkstreamDeliverablesSuccess Criteria
Pilot ExecutionPilots completed, results measured, learnings documented2+ pilots deliver measurable value
Production DeploymentFirst AI system in production useSystem live, users trained, monitoring active
Process DevelopmentAI development lifecycle documented, repeatable processSecond pilot follows documented process
Capability BuildingAdditional training, specialized hires, vendor partnershipsTechnical capability sufficient for planned scale
Governance Maturationrisk register populated, board reporting establishedgovernance committee reviews production systems

Build Phase Milestones:

  • Month 8: First pilot results available
  • Month 9: First production deployment decision
  • Month 10: Second pilot begins
  • Month 12: Build phase review and decision gate

Decision Gate Questions (Month 12):

  • Have pilots demonstrated expected value?
  • Are we ready to scale successful approaches?
  • What capability gaps remain?
  • What adjustments are needed for Scale phase?

Phase 3: Scale (Months 13-18)

Objective: Expand proven AI approaches across the organization and establish sustainable operating model.

Scale phase multiplies success. It's not about starting new experiments—it's about extending what works.

Key Workstreams:

WorkstreamDeliverablesSuccess Criteria
Deployment ExpansionSuccessful pilots scaled to broader use3+ AI systems in production
Operating ModelAI Center of Excellence or embedded model operationalClear ownership, processes, and accountability
ROI RealizationBusiness value measured and reportedDocumented ROI meets or exceeds projections
Next Horizon PlanningYear 2 roadmap developedStrategy refresh and next 18-month plan approved
Continuous ImprovementOptimization of deployed systems, lessons learnedPerformance metrics improving quarter over quarter

Scale Phase Milestones:

  • Month 14: Second production deployment
  • Month 15: Year 1 ROI assessment
  • Month 16: Year 2 strategy and roadmap drafted
  • Month 18: Roadmap completion review

Decision Gate Questions (Month 18):

  • What business value has been created?
  • What capabilities have we built?
  • What works? What doesn't?
  • What should the next 18 months focus on?

SOP: Quarterly Roadmap Review

Roadmaps drift without disciplined review. This Standard Operating Procedure ensures roadmaps remain relevant and accountable.

Purpose

Quarterly review ensures roadmap alignment with strategy, tracks progress against milestones, and enables course corrections.

Frequency

Quarterly (aligned with business planning cycle)

Participants

  • AI/Digital Leader (Chair)
  • Executive Sponsor
  • IT Leadership
  • Business Unit Representatives
  • Risk/Compliance Representative
  • Finance Representative

Pre-Meeting Preparation (Owner: AI/Digital Leader)

One week before meeting:

  1. Collect status updates from all workstream leads
  2. Compile milestone progress (completed, in progress, at risk, not started)
  3. Prepare variance analysis (actual vs. planned)
  4. Document emerging risks and issues
  5. Gather budget status (actual vs. planned spend)
  6. Prepare draft roadmap adjustments for discussion

Meeting Agenda (90 minutes)

TimeTopicOwner
0:00Strategic context updateExecutive Sponsor
0:10Milestone reviewAI/Digital Leader
0:30Variance analysis and root causesAI/Digital Leader
0:45Risk and issue discussionAll
1:00Budget reviewFinance
1:10Proposed roadmap adjustmentsAI/Digital Leader
1:20Decision and action itemsChair

Decision Types

DecisionAuthorityCriteria
Minor timeline adjustment (<4 weeks)AI/Digital LeaderDocumented rationale
Milestone change or additionSteering CommitteeMajority approval
Scope change (add/remove workstream)Executive SponsorBusiness case required
Budget reallocation (>10%)Executive Sponsor + FinanceApproval required
Phase gate decisionSteering CommitteeDefined criteria met

Post-Meeting Actions (Owner: AI/Digital Leader)

Within one week:

  1. Distribute meeting notes and decisions
  2. Update roadmap document with approved changes
  3. Communicate adjustments to affected teams
  4. Update risk register
  5. Schedule follow-up on action items

Documentation

Maintain quarterly review records including:

  • Meeting attendance
  • Milestone status at time of review
  • Decisions made
  • Roadmap changes approved
  • Action items and owners

Roadmap Template

Phase 1: Foundation (Months 1-6)

MonthDataInfrastructureGovernanceSkillsPilots
1Data inventory beginsCloud assessmentPolicy draftingTraining needs assessmentUse case shortlisting
2Quality assessmentEnvironment designPolicy reviewTraining program designPilot selection
3Governance frameworkEnvironment buildPolicy approvalTraining pilotPilot planning
4Data quality remediationIntegration architectureCommittee formationTraining rolloutPilot 1 kickoff
5Continued remediationSecurity implementationFirst committee meetingContinued trainingPilot 1 execution
6Foundation reviewEnvironment operationalPhase gate reviewTraining milestonePilot 1 results

Phase 2: Build (Months 7-12)

MonthPilotsProductionProcessCapabilityGovernance
7Pilot 1 wrap-upProduction planningProcess documentationAdvanced trainingRisk register setup
8Pilot 2 kickoffDeployment prepProcess reviewSpecialized hiringBoard report drafted
9Pilot 2 executionFirst deploymentProcess refinementVendor evaluationFirst board report
10Pilot 3 kickoffMonitoring setupProcess trainingPartnership explorationPolicy review
11Pilot 3 executionOptimizationProcess adoptionCapability assessmentCompliance review
12Build phase reviewProduction stableProcess documentedCapability gaps identifiedPhase gate review

Phase 3: Scale (Months 13-18)

MonthExpansionOperating ModelROIPlanningImprovement
13Second deployment planningModel designROI tracking setupRetrospectiveOptimization begins
14Second deploymentModel pilotingQ1 ROI analysisLessons learnedPerformance review
15Third deployment planningModel refinementYear 1 ROIStrategy refreshMetrics analysis
16Third deploymentModel operationalROI reportingYear 2 roadmap draftContinuous improvement
17Expansion assessmentModel optimizationValue communicationRoadmap reviewSystem optimization
18Roadmap completionModel matureFinal Year 1 reportYear 2 approvalImprovement roadmap

Common Failure Modes

1. Overloading the Roadmap

Attempting too many initiatives simultaneously dilutes focus and exhausts resources.

Fix: Limit active workstreams. Two major initiatives executing well beats five struggling.

2. Ignoring Dependencies

AI initiatives have dependencies—on data, on infrastructure, on skills. Ignoring them creates bottlenecks.

Fix: Map dependencies explicitly. Don't schedule work that depends on incomplete prerequisites.

3. Fixed Thinking

Treating the roadmap as immutable when circumstances change.

Fix: Quarterly reviews with genuine authority to adjust. The roadmap serves the strategy, not the other way around.

4. Milestone Without Meaning

Milestones that don't represent genuine progress ("complete documentation") rather than outcomes ("pilot delivers 20% efficiency improvement").

Fix: Define milestones in terms of outcomes, not activities.

5. Disconnection from Budget

Roadmap plans without corresponding budget allocation.

Fix: Every roadmap element must have allocated resources. Unfunded initiatives are wishes, not plans.


Checklist: AI Roadmap Development

Preparation

  • AI strategy approved and available
  • Executive sponsor confirmed
  • Roadmap development team identified
  • Current state assessment completed
  • Resource constraints understood

Phase Design

  • Three phases defined with clear objectives
  • Workstreams identified for each phase
  • Milestones defined as outcomes, not activities
  • Dependencies mapped between workstreams
  • Decision gates defined with criteria

Resource Alignment

  • Budget allocated to each phase
  • People resources assigned or planned
  • Technology requirements specified
  • External support needs identified

Governance

  • Quarterly review process established
  • Decision authority defined
  • Escalation path clear
  • Reporting cadence set

Metrics to Track

MetricWhat It MeasuresFrequency
Milestone completion rate% of milestones met on timeMonthly
Budget varianceActual vs. planned spendMonthly
Scope changesNumber and impact of changesQuarterly
Decision gate passageWhether criteria met at gatesPer gate
Business value deliveredROI of deployed initiativesQuarterly

Frequently Asked Questions


Next Steps

A roadmap transforms AI ambition into executable plans. It creates accountability, enables tracking, and provides a structure for learning and adjustment.

If you have a strategy but lack a concrete implementation plan, roadmap development is your next step.

Book an AI Readiness Audit with Pertama Partners to develop a roadmap grounded in your specific context, capabilities, and constraints.


Frequently Asked Questions

Eighteen months balances ambition with accountability. Shorter horizons don't allow for meaningful capability building. Longer horizons become speculative and lose urgency.

Michael Lansdowne Hauge

Founder & Managing Partner

Founder & Managing Partner at Pertama Partners. Founder of Pertama Group.

AI RoadmapImplementationPlanningExecutive LeadershipStrategy ExecutionAI roadmap creation guide18-month AI implementation planexecutive AI roadmap template

Explore Further

Key terms:AI Roadmap

Ready to Apply These Insights to Your Organization?

Book a complimentary AI Readiness Audit to identify opportunities specific to your context.

Book an AI Readiness Audit