When an AI incident hits, minutes matter. Knowing who to call—and who can wait—prevents both under-reaction (problems get worse) and over-reaction (executives woken at 3 AM for routine issues).
An escalation matrix provides clear guidance: this severity means these people, within this timeframe, via this channel. No judgment calls in the chaos of an incident.
This guide provides a framework for building your AI incident escalation matrix.
Executive Summary
- Escalation must be automatic, not deliberated: Clear criteria eliminate decision delay
- Different severities require different responses: Not every incident needs executive involvement
- AI incidents have unique escalation needs: Technical experts, compliance, and governance roles matter
- Communication channels affect response: Page critical incidents; email routine ones
- Over-escalation is better than under-escalation: When uncertain, escalate
- Escalation matrix needs testing: Tabletop exercises reveal gaps
- Keep it updated: Role changes, contact changes, and lessons learned require updates
Why This Matters Now
Without an escalation matrix:
- Response is delayed while someone decides who to call
- Wrong people are contacted based on whoever responder knows
- Critical incidents are under-escalated and problems grow
- Routine incidents are over-escalated and leadership loses confidence
- Accountability is unclear when things go wrong
An escalation matrix removes ambiguity. It's the difference between "I didn't know this was serious" and "I followed the process."
Escalation Matrix Components
Component 1: Severity Levels
Define what each severity means and typical AI incident examples:
| Severity | Definition | AI Incident Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Critical (P1) | Active harm occurring; major business impact; regulatory exposure | Data breach exposing personal data; AI making harmful decisions at scale; complete system failure |
| High (P2) | Significant risk; contained but serious; likely regulatory interest | Bias detected affecting decisions; security vulnerability discovered; significant accuracy degradation |
| Medium (P3) | Limited impact; investigation needed; no immediate business crisis | Moderate drift detected; policy violation discovered; localized performance issues |
| Low (P4) | Minor issues; improvement opportunity; no immediate action required | Minor anomalies; near-miss events; documentation gaps |
Component 2: Notification Tiers
Define who should be notified at each tier:
Tier 1: Immediate Response Team
- On-call responder
- Technical lead
- System owner
Tier 2: Incident Management
- Incident Commander
- Core AI-IRT members
- Security lead (if security-relevant)
Tier 3: Senior Management
- VP/Director level
- Department heads
- Risk leadership
Tier 4: Executive
- C-level executives
- Board (for critical incidents)
- External stakeholders
Component 3: Timeframes
Define when notification must happen:
| Severity | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Tier 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Critical | Immediate | <30 min | <1 hour | <4 hours |
| High | <30 min | <2 hours | <4 hours | <24 hours (if needed) |
| Medium | <2 hours | <4 hours | <24 hours | Update only |
| Low | <4 hours | <24 hours | Weekly report | N/A |
Component 4: Communication Channels
Define how to reach people by urgency:
| Urgency | Channels |
|---|---|
| Immediate | Phone call, paging system, SMS |
| Urgent | Phone + email, instant message |
| Standard | Email, ticket system |
| Informational | Email, report, status update |
AI Incident Escalation Matrix Template
Critical (P1) Incidents
| Role | Name | Contact | Channel | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-call Responder | [Name] | [Phone] | Page/Call | Immediate |
| AI Technical Lead | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <15 min |
| Incident Commander | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <15 min |
| Data Protection Officer | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <30 min |
| CISO | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <30 min |
| Legal Counsel | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <30 min |
| CTO/CIO | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <1 hour |
| CEO | [Name] | [Phone] | Call | <2 hours |
| Board Chair (if needed) | [Name] | [Phone] | Call | <4 hours |
| Communications Lead | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call | <1 hour |
High (P2) Incidents
| Role | Name | Contact | Channel | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On-call Responder | [Name] | [Phone] | Call/SMS | <30 min |
| AI Technical Lead | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call/Email | <1 hour |
| Incident Commander | [Name] | [Phone, Email] | Call/Email | <1 hour |
| Data Protection Officer | [Name] | [Email] | Email + call | <2 hours |
| System Owner | [Name] | [Email] | <2 hours | |
| Department Head | [Name] | [Email] | <4 hours | |
| CTO/CIO | [Name] | [Email] | Email update | <24 hours |
Medium (P3) Incidents
| Role | Name | Contact | Channel | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned Responder | [Name] | [Email] | Ticket/Email | <2 hours |
| AI Technical Lead | [Name] | [Email] | <4 hours | |
| System Owner | [Name] | [Email] | <4 hours | |
| Manager | [Name] | [Email] | <24 hours |
Low (P4) Incidents
| Role | Name | Contact | Channel | Timeframe |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assigned Responder | [Name] | [Email] | Ticket | <24 hours |
| Technical Lead | [Name] | [Email] | Weekly report | Weekly |
AI-Specific Escalation Considerations
When to Involve AI/ML Specialists
| Scenario | Escalate to | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Model behavior anomaly | AI/ML Engineer | Technical diagnosis needed |
| Drift detected | AI Team Lead | Retraining decision required |
| Explainability question | AI Ethics Lead | Interpretation expertise |
| Training data issue | Data Team Lead | Data pipeline knowledge |
When to Involve Compliance/Legal
| Scenario | Escalate to | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Personal data exposed | DPO | Notification assessment |
| Potential discrimination | Legal + DPO | Legal exposure |
| Regulatory inquiry | Legal + Compliance | Response coordination |
| Third-party AI failure | Legal + Procurement | Contract implications |
When to Involve External Parties
| Scenario | Escalate to | Why |
|---|---|---|
| AI vendor system failure | Vendor support | Root cause and fix |
| Potential law enforcement matter | Legal | Coordination required |
| Regulatory notification | DPO + Legal | Compliance requirement |
| Media inquiry | Communications | Message management |
Escalation Decision Tree
Escalation Communication Templates
Critical Incident Initial Escalation
SUBJECT: [CRITICAL] AI Incident - [Brief Description]
TIME: [Date/Time]
SEVERITY: CRITICAL (P1)
INCIDENT COMMANDER: [Name]
SUMMARY:
[2-3 sentence description of what's happening]
CURRENT IMPACT:
- [Key impact 1]
- [Key impact 2]
IMMEDIATE ACTIONS:
- [Action being taken 1]
- [Action being taken 2]
NEXT UPDATE: [Time] or sooner if status changes
CONFERENCE BRIDGE: [Details]
QUESTIONS: Contact [Incident Commander] at [contact]
Escalation Update
SUBJECT: [SEVERITY] AI Incident Update - [Brief Description]
UPDATE TIME: [Date/Time]
INCIDENT STATUS: [Investigating/Contained/Resolved/Monitoring]
CHANGES SINCE LAST UPDATE:
- [Change 1]
- [Change 2]
CURRENT IMPACT:
[Updated impact assessment]
NEXT STEPS:
- [Planned action 1]
- [Planned action 2]
NEXT UPDATE: [Time]
Common Failure Modes
1. Escalation Paralysis
Responder uncertain who to call, so they call no one. Solution: Clear, unambiguous criteria.
2. Contact Information Outdated
Matrix lists someone who left six months ago. Solution: Regular verification (monthly for critical contacts).
3. Single Point of Contact
One person is the only escalation path. Solution: Backups for every role.
4. No After-Hours Path
Matrix works only during business hours. Solution: 24/7 contacts for critical roles.
5. Channel Mismatch
Emailing someone at 2 AM for a critical incident. Solution: Define channels by urgency.
6. Escalation Without Information
Escalating "there's a problem" without useful details. Solution: Templates that capture necessary information.
Implementation Checklist
Building the Matrix
- Define severity levels with clear criteria
- Identify roles for each escalation tier
- Assign primary and backup contacts
- Collect contact information (multiple channels)
- Define timeframes by severity
- Create escalation decision tree
- Develop communication templates
Testing and Validation
- Review with all escalation contacts
- Verify contact information works
- Conduct tabletop exercise
- Test after-hours escalation
- Validate decision tree with scenarios
- Document and address gaps
Maintenance
- Assign matrix owner
- Schedule regular contact verification (monthly)
- Update after organizational changes
- Review after each significant incident
- Annual comprehensive review
Metrics to Track
| Metric | Target |
|---|---|
| Time from detection to initial escalation | <15 min for Critical |
| Escalation accuracy (right level for incident) | >90% |
| Contact reachability | >95% first attempt |
| Matrix accuracy (contacts current) | 100% |
| Post-incident escalation review | 100% for High/Critical |
Frequently Asked Questions
What if I'm unsure about severity?
Escalate at the higher level. It's better to over-escalate and adjust than under-escalate and have problems grow.
Who can change severity during an incident?
The Incident Commander can adjust severity based on new information, with corresponding escalation changes.
What if the primary contact doesn't respond?
Move to backup contact immediately. Document non-response. Follow up after incident.
Should we escalate vendor issues the same way?
Escalate internally according to the matrix based on impact to your organization, regardless of whether the root cause is with a vendor.
How do we handle escalation during holidays?
Maintain on-call coverage and backup escalation paths for critical roles. Some escalations may be delayed for lower severities.
What if an executive requests lower escalation?
Document the request. Escalation levels should be based on objective criteria, not preferences. If criteria indicate escalation, escalate.
Taking Action
An escalation matrix is only useful if it exists before you need it, if everyone knows how to use it, and if it's kept current.
Build it now. Test it regularly. Update it when things change. When the incident comes, you'll be ready.
Ready to strengthen your AI incident escalation processes?
Pertama Partners helps organizations build comprehensive AI incident response capabilities, including escalation frameworks. Our AI Readiness Audit includes incident response assessment.
References
- ITIL. (2024). Incident Management Practice Guide.
- NIST. (2023). Computer Security Incident Handling Guide (SP 800-61).
- PagerDuty. (2024). Incident Response Operations.
- Atlassian. (2024). Incident Management Handbook.
- Google SRE. (2024). Incident Response.
Frequently Asked Questions
Escalate for safety risks, significant data breaches, regulatory notification requirements, major financial impact, reputational risk, and when response requires decisions beyond team authority.
Map incident categories to appropriate stakeholders, define notification timelines, specify communication channels, and establish backup contacts. Test escalation procedures regularly.
Define clear criteria for each escalation level, train responders on classification, review escalation decisions post-incident, and adjust criteria based on patterns.
References
- ITIL. (2024). *Incident Management Practice Guide*.. ITIL *Incident Management Practice Guide* (2024)
- NIST. (2023). *Computer Security Incident Handling Guide (SP 800-61)*.. NIST *Computer Security Incident Handling Guide * (2023)
- PagerDuty. (2024). *Incident Response Operations*.. PagerDuty *Incident Response Operations* (2024)
- Atlassian. (2024). *Incident Management Handbook*.. Atlassian *Incident Management Handbook* (2024)
- Google SRE. (2024). *Incident Response*.. Google SRE *Incident Response* (2024)

