With limited resources and unlimited AI ideas, prioritization is essential. This guide provides a practical framework for ranking and selecting AI initiatives based on business value, feasibility, and risk.
Executive Summary
- Prioritization prevents scattered effort — Focus resources on highest-impact initiatives
- Multiple criteria matter — Business value, feasibility, risk, and strategic alignment
- Scoring creates objectivity — Reduces politics and gut-feel decisions
- Quick wins build momentum — Balance transformational bets with fast results
- Regular review — Priorities shift; reassess quarterly
- Portfolio balance — Mix quick wins, strategic bets, and foundation investments
- Decision tree accelerates selection — Fast filtering before detailed scoring
Why This Matters Now
Resource Constraints. You can't pursue every AI opportunity. Prioritization ensures resources flow to highest-value initiatives.
Opportunity Cost. Every initiative you pursue means another you don't. Choose wisely.
Organizational Fatigue. Too many concurrent initiatives dilute focus and exhaust teams.
Credibility. Successful delivery of prioritized initiatives builds confidence. Failed "everything at once" approaches damage trust.
The AI Prioritization Framework
Step 1: Generate Candidate List
Collect all potential AI initiatives from:
- Strategy workshops
- Department requests
- Vendor suggestions
- Competitive analysis
- Customer feedback
- Innovation ideas
Output: Raw list of 20-50+ potential initiatives
Step 2: Initial Filtering
Apply quick filters to eliminate non-starters:
Does this initiative:
├── Align with business strategy?
│ └── No → REMOVE
├── Have an identifiable business owner?
│ └── No → DEFER until sponsor found
├── Have data available (or obtainable)?
│ └── No → DEFER until data ready
└── Pass ethical/compliance review?
└── No → REMOVE or REDESIGN
Output: Filtered list of 10-20 viable candidates
Step 3: Scoring
Score each remaining initiative on multiple criteria:
Business Value (40% weight)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | >$1M annual impact or major strategic advantage |
| 4 | $500K-$1M annual impact |
| 3 | $100K-$500K annual impact |
| 2 | <$100K annual impact |
| 1 | Intangible or uncertain value |
Feasibility (25% weight)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Proven solution, internal capability, data ready |
| 4 | Some complexity, minor capability gaps |
| 3 | Moderate complexity, some capability building needed |
| 2 | Significant complexity, major capability gaps |
| 1 | High technical uncertainty, unproven approach |
Time to Value (15% weight)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | <3 months to initial value |
| 4 | 3-6 months |
| 3 | 6-12 months |
| 2 | 12-18 months |
| 1 | >18 months |
Risk (10% weight, inverted)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Low risk, minimal downside |
| 4 | Moderate risk, manageable |
| 3 | Significant risk, requires mitigation |
| 2 | High risk, substantial mitigation needed |
| 1 | Very high risk, potential for serious harm |
Strategic Alignment (10% weight)
| Score | Criteria |
|---|---|
| 5 | Directly supports top strategic priority |
| 4 | Supports stated strategic objective |
| 3 | Indirectly supports strategy |
| 2 | Neutral to strategy |
| 1 | Potentially misaligned |
Step 4: Rank and Categorize
Calculate weighted scores and rank initiatives:
Weighted Score = (Value × 0.4) + (Feasibility × 0.25) + (Time × 0.15) + (Risk × 0.1) + (Strategy × 0.1)
Categorize into quadrants:
Step 5: Build Portfolio
Balance your AI portfolio:
| Category | Allocation | Characteristics |
|---|---|---|
| Quick Wins | 40% | High feasibility, fast value, lower transformational impact |
| Strategic Bets | 40% | Medium-term, significant value, manageable risk |
| Big Bets | 15% | Longer-term, transformational potential, higher risk |
| Exploration | 5% | Experiments, emerging technology, learning value |
Prioritization Matrix Template
| Initiative | Value (40%) | Feasibility (25%) | Time (15%) | Risk (10%) | Strategy (10%) | Weighted Score | Rank | Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Name 1] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Calc] | [#] | [Cat] |
| [Name 2] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [1-5] | [Calc] | [#] | [Cat] |
Common Failure Modes
Scoring Inflation. Everyone scores their initiative 5/5. Fix: Calibrate with examples; limit top scores.
Ignoring Dependencies. Initiative B requires Initiative A. Fix: Map dependencies before finalizing priorities.
Pet Project Bias. Senior executives force their favorites through. Fix: Transparent scoring; separate scoring from ranking.
Only Quick Wins. Easy projects dominate; strategic capability never builds. Fix: Enforce portfolio balance.
Analysis Paralysis. Perfect prioritization takes forever. Fix: Time-box the process; done beats perfect.
Checklist for AI Prioritization
- Candidate initiatives gathered from all sources
- Initial filtering applied
- Scoring criteria defined and calibrated
- Each initiative scored objectively
- Weighted scores calculated
- Initiatives ranked
- Dependencies mapped
- Portfolio balance checked
- Top initiatives resourced
- Quarterly review scheduled
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: How many initiatives should we pursue at once? A: Depends on resources. Most organizations can handle 5-8 concurrent AI initiatives effectively. Less is often more.
Q: How do we handle ties in scoring? A: Use strategic alignment as tiebreaker, then feasibility. If still tied, executive judgment decides.
Q: Should we adjust weights for our context? A: Yes. A startup might weight speed higher; a regulated industry might weight risk higher.
Q: How often should we reprioritize? A: Quarterly review of the full portfolio. Ad-hoc when major changes occur (strategy shift, new opportunities).
Ready to Prioritize Your AI Initiatives?
A clear prioritization framework ensures resources flow to highest-impact opportunities.
Book an AI Readiness Audit to get expert help identifying and prioritizing your AI opportunities.
[Contact Pertama Partners →]
References
- McKinsey & Company. (2024). "AI Use Case Prioritization."
- MIT Sloan. (2024). "Scaling AI: Strategy and Prioritization."
- Gartner. (2024). "Technology Investment Prioritization."
Frequently Asked Questions
Use a structured framework scoring business impact, feasibility, risk, and strategic alignment. Create a portfolio view balancing quick wins with strategic investments.
Consider strategic value, implementation complexity, resource requirements, risk level, time to value, and dependencies with other initiatives.
Portfolio thinking: allocate majority to near-term productivity gains, substantial portion to capability building, and smaller amount to exploration. Adjust based on maturity.
References
- McKinsey & Company. (2024). "AI Use Case Prioriti. McKinsey & Company "AI Use Case Prioriti (2024)
