How accurate are AI predictions of student drop-out risk?

Accuracy depends on data quality and historical cohort size. Well-trained models achieve 70-85% accuracy predicting at-risk students 4-6 weeks ahead. The key is using leading indicators (engagement trends, early assignment performance) rather than lagging indicators (midterm failures). We'll help you validate model accuracy against your historical data and continuously improve predictions as you collect more cohort data.

What student data do we need for predictive analytics?

Minimum viable data: (1) LMS engagement (login frequency, discussion posts, assignment submissions), (2) SIS academic records (grades, course enrollment), (3) Demographic data (age, first-generation status, financial aid). Enhanced models benefit from: attendance tracking, library usage, tutoring center visits, housing check-ins, financial aid status. During Discovery, we'll assess your data completeness and recommend quick-win data collection improvements.

How do we avoid privacy violations and demographic bias in AI retention models?

Critical concerns addressed in Module 1. We train you to: (1) Use aggregate engagement patterns (not individual surveillance), (2) Obtain student consent for data use in early warning systems, (3) Test models for demographic bias (ensure AI doesn't unfairly flag minority students), (4) Provide transparency (students should know they're flagged and why), (5) Comply with FERPA, PDPA, and institutional ethics. AI should support equitable outcomes, not perpetuate bias.

Will advisors feel replaced by AI automation?

No — AI is designed to augment advisor effectiveness, not replace human connection. The training emphasises AI as triage tool (prioritizing which students need outreach) while advisors provide the empathetic, personalized support that drives retention. Advisors spend less time manually reviewing rosters and more time having meaningful conversations with students who need help. Module 4 explicitly addresses advisor concerns and demonstrates AI as workload relief.

How long before we see retention rate improvements?

Initial pilots show results within 1 semester (reduced D/F/W rates in target courses). Measurable retention rate improvements typically appear within 1 academic year. Long-term graduation rate impacts take 2-4 years to fully materialize. The key is starting with high-impact interventions (first-year students, gateway courses) where early wins demonstrate AI value and build institutional buy-in for broader deployment.

Training Solutions

EDU-RETAIN

Cohort-basedSubsidy eligible

AI Student Engagement & Retention Analytics

Student success teams can deploy AI early warning systems improving retention by 8-15% and enabling proactive intervention 4-6 weeks before potential drop-outs

Train student success teams, advisors, and administrators to use AI predictive analytics for early identification of at-risk students, engagement pattern analysis, and data-driven intervention strategies. Designed for institutions seeking to improve retention rates and graduation outcomes through proactive student support.

Duration3-4 days

InvestmentUSD $15,000 - $28,000

Best forStudent success teams, academic advisors, enrollment managers, and institutional research professionals focused on improving retention, reducing drop-outs, and increasing graduation rates

Start a Conversation Request Solution Brief

THE CHALLENGE

Sound familiar?

“

We only identify at-risk students after they fail a midterm — by then it's too late to intervene effectively.

“

Advisors are overwhelmed with 300+ advisees each and can't proactively reach out to struggling students.

“

Our retention data is siloed across LMS, SIS, financial aid, and housing systems with no unified view.

“

We know our first-year retention rate is 75% but don't know which students will drop out until they do.

“

Intervention programmes are reactive — we need AI to predict who needs help 4-6 weeks in advance.

Trusted by enterprises across Southeast Asia

Financial Services

Healthcare

Education

Manufacturing

Professional Services

Government

OUTCOMES

What you'll achieve

Problems you'll solve

At-risk student identification happening reactively (after failures) instead of predictively (4-6 weeks ahead)
Advisor workload preventing proactive outreach to struggling students (300+ advisees per advisor)
Student engagement data fragmented across LMS, SIS, financial aid, and housing with no unified analytics
Intervention programmes lacking data-driven prioritization of highest-risk students
Retention strategies based on historical trends instead of real-time predictive signals

Value you'll gain

Retention Improvement: Increase retention rates by 8-15% through early identification and intervention
Advisor Efficiency: Enable advisors to focus on highest-risk 20% of students using AI prioritisation
Early Warning: Identify at-risk students 4-6 weeks before potential drop-out (vs. post-failure detection)
Intervention ROI: Measure effectiveness of support programmes using AI outcome tracking
Revenue Protection: Reduce tuition revenue loss from drop-outs by 10-18% through improved retention

OUR PROCESS

How we deliver results

Step 1

Data Integration Assessment

Map student data sources (LMS, SIS, financial aid, housing, attendance) and assess data quality for predictive analytics readiness.

Step 2

Tool Selection & Configuration

Evaluate AI student success platforms (Civitas Learning, EAB Navigate, Starfish) or build custom predictive models using your institution's data.

Step 3

Hands-On Delivery

Multi-day training building predictive risk models, engagement dashboards, and automated intervention workflows using real student data.

Step 4

Intervention Strategy Development

Design data-driven intervention programmes targeting specific risk factors (academic, financial, social) with measurable success criteria.

Step 5

Deployment & Measurement

30-day coaching to deploy AI early warning systems, train advisors on predictive dashboards, and measure retention outcome improvements.

What you'll receive

Student Data Readiness Assessment with retention trend analysis
AI predictive risk models configured with your institutional data
Advisor early warning dashboards and automated intervention workflows
Data-driven intervention programme designs targeting academic, financial, and social risk factors
Individual learning certificates and competency assessments
30-day post-programme coaching and outcome measurement support

Best for

Student success teams, academic advisors, enrollment managers, and institutional research professionals focused on improving retention, reducing drop-outs, and increasing graduation rates

IS THIS RIGHT FOR YOU?

Finding the right fit

This is ideal for you if...

Institutions with retention rates below 80% seeking data-driven improvement strategies
Student success teams overwhelmed by large advisor-to-student ratios (300+ advisees)
Universities implementing early alert systems and proactive student support initiatives
Institutions with LMS and SIS data ready for predictive analytics

Consider another option if...

Institutions with highly fragmented student data lacking LMS or SIS integration
Teams seeking retention improvements without willingness to redesign intervention workflows
Schools with retention rates above 90% (limited room for improvement)

See yourself in the list above?

Let's Talk

CURRICULUM

What you'll learn

2 days total

Build AI models to predict at-risk students using engagement data, academic performance, and demographic factors.

What you'll be able to do

Build predictive risk models using LMS engagement data (login frequency, discussion participation, assignment submission)
Identify leading indicators of student drop-out (academic, financial, social, health)
Segment students into risk tiers (high/medium/low) for prioritised advisor intervention
Validate model accuracy using historical cohort data and avoid demographic bias
Design early warning dashboards showing real-time risk scores for advisors and faculty