Whether it's internal audit, external auditors, or a regulatory examination, AI audits are becoming common. Organizations that prepare systematically demonstrate governance maturity and avoid uncomfortable surprises.
Executive Summary
- Audits are coming — Internal audit, external auditors, and regulators are examining AI governance
- Preparation beats reaction — Organizations that prepare systematically fare better
- Four preparation pillars — Documentation, controls, evidence, and people readiness
- Common gaps are predictable — Most organizations struggle with the same issues
- Start 90 days before — Meaningful preparation requires time
- Evidence matters most — Auditors want proof, not promises
- Post-audit is ongoing — Address findings promptly; demonstrate continuous improvement
Why This Matters Now
Regulatory Attention. MAS, PDPC, and sector regulators have AI on their radar. (/insights/ai-regulations-singapore-imda-compliance) (/insights/pdpa-ai-compliance-singapore-guide)
Internal Audit Mandate. Internal audit functions are adding AI to their audit plans.
Board Expectation. Directors want assurance that AI is governed appropriately. (/insights/ai-board-risk-oversight-structure)
What Auditors Examine
Governance Framework: Structure, accountability, policies, roles Risk Management: Identification, assessment, mitigation, monitoring (/insights/ai-risk-assessment-framework-templates) Model Lifecycle: Development, testing, deployment, retirement Compliance: Regulatory mapping, data protection, industry requirements (/insights/ai-compliance-checklist-regulatory-preparation) Controls: Technical, operational, management, third-party
AI Audit Preparation SOP
Phase 1: Scoping (Days 1-15)
- Confirm audit scope — Systems, aspects, time period, documents
- Identify stakeholders — Audit lead, interviewees, coordinators
- Review previous audits — Findings, remediation, recurring themes
Phase 2: Documentation Preparation (Days 16-45)
- Complete AI inventory — All systems documented, owners identified
- Review policies — Governance, acceptable use, approval process (/insights/ai-policy-essential-components)
- Risk documentation — Register, assessments, mitigations (/insights/ai-risk-register-template)
- Compliance documentation — Requirements, status, evidence
- Meeting records — Minutes, decisions, action items
Phase 3: Control Validation (Days 46-60)
- Test technical controls — Access, logging, security, data protection
- Test operational controls — Procedures, training, incidents
- Test management controls — Reporting, reviews, approvals
- Test vendor controls — Assessments, contracts, monitoring (/insights/ai-vendor-security-assessment-checklist)
Phase 4: Gap Remediation (Days 61-80)
- Prioritize gaps — By severity and effort
- Remediate where possible — High-priority first
- Document remaining gaps — With plans and timelines
Phase 5: Evidence Preparation (Days 81-90)
- Organize evidence — Create index, organize by topic
- Prepare interviewees — Brief on scope, review questions
- Establish logistics — Schedules, workspaces, technology
- Prepare opening briefing — Overview, governance, status, issues
Documentation Checklist
Governance:
- AI governance policy
- AI strategy document
- Committee charter and minutes
- Board AI updates (/insights/ai-board-reporting-template-updates)
- Roles and responsibilities
Risk:
- AI risk framework
- AI risk register
- Individual risk assessments
- Incident log and response plan (/insights/ai-incident-response-plan)
Compliance:
- Regulatory requirements mapping
- Compliance status report
- Data protection impact assessments (/insights/data-protection-impact-assessment-ai-dpia)
Operations:
- AI system inventory (/insights/ai-model-inventory-document-track-systems)
- Approval and testing records
- Monitoring reports
- Training records
Vendors:
- Vendor risk assessments
- Contracts with AI terms
- Exit plans
Common Audit Findings
- Incomplete AI Inventory — Shadow AI is prevalent
- Outdated Policies — Not updated for AI
- Missing Risk Assessments — Deployed without assessment
- Inadequate Vendor Due Diligence — Third-party AI not assessed
- Insufficient Documentation — Decisions without rationale
- Weak Monitoring — No ongoing performance tracking
- Training Gaps — Staff untrained on AI tools
- Incident Response Gaps — No AI-specific procedures
During and After the Audit
During:
- Coordinate responses through single point of contact
- Be responsive and honest
- Document everything
- Escalate appropriately
After:
- Review draft findings for accuracy
- Accept valid findings
- Develop remediation plan with owners and dates
- Track and report remediation progress
Checklist: AI Audit Readiness
- Audit scope confirmed
- Previous findings reviewed
- Documentation complete
- Controls tested
- Gaps identified and prioritized
- Remediation completed where possible
- Evidence organized
- Interviewees prepared
- Logistics confirmed
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to Prepare for AI Audit?
Audit readiness demonstrates governance maturity.
Book an AI Readiness Audit to identify gaps before internal or external auditors do.
[Contact Pertama Partners →]
References
- IIA. (2024). "Auditing Artificial Intelligence."
- ISACA. (2024). "AI Audit Program."
- Deloitte. (2024). "AI Audit Readiness Assessment."
- MAS. (2023). "Technology Risk Management Guidelines."
Frequently Asked Questions
Internal audit typically provides 2-4 weeks. External auditors coordinate with management. Regulatory exams may have less notice.
References
- Auditing Artificial Intelligence.. IIA (2024)
- AI Audit Program.. ISACA (2024)
- AI Audit Readiness Assessment.. Deloitte (2024)
- Technology Risk Management Guidelines.. MAS (2023)

