What is Teleoperation?
Teleoperation is the remote control of a robot or machine by a human operator from a distance, using communication links to transmit commands and receive sensory feedback. It enables skilled operators to perform tasks in hazardous, remote, or inaccessible environments, and serves as a critical fallback when autonomous systems encounter situations beyond their capabilities.
What is Teleoperation?
Teleoperation is the practice of controlling a robot or machine from a distance, where a human operator sends commands through a communication link and receives sensory feedback, typically video and audio, from the robot's perspective. The operator remains in a safe and comfortable location while the robot performs physical work in environments that may be dangerous, distant, or otherwise inaccessible.
Teleoperation ranges from simple remote control, where every robot movement is directly commanded by the operator, to sophisticated shared autonomy systems where the operator provides high-level guidance while the robot handles low-level execution details like path planning and obstacle avoidance.
How Teleoperation Works
Communication Infrastructure
Teleoperation requires reliable, low-latency communication between the operator and the robot:
- Control signals: Commands from the operator to the robot, including movement directions, speed, and action triggers
- Feedback channels: Video streams, audio, force feedback, and telemetry data flowing from the robot to the operator
- Network requirements: Latency below 100 milliseconds for precise manipulation tasks, with higher latency acceptable for supervisory control
- Communication media: WiFi, 4G/5G cellular, satellite links, or dedicated radio frequencies depending on distance and environment
Operator Interface
The quality of the operator interface significantly impacts teleoperation effectiveness:
- Video displays: Single or multiple screens showing robot camera feeds, often with overlay information showing sensor data and system status
- Control devices: Joysticks, game controllers, specialised master arms, or even gesture-based interfaces
- Haptic feedback: Force-feedback devices that let the operator "feel" what the robot touches, critical for delicate manipulation tasks
- Augmented reality overlays: Digital information superimposed on video feeds showing planned paths, obstacle warnings, and measurement data
Levels of Autonomy
Modern teleoperation systems operate along a spectrum of autonomy:
- Direct teleoperation: The operator controls every movement of the robot in real time. Simple but demanding for the operator and sensitive to communication delays.
- Supervisory control: The operator issues high-level commands such as "go to location X" or "pick up object Y" and the robot executes autonomously. The operator monitors and intervenes only when needed.
- Shared autonomy: The robot handles routine actions autonomously while the operator manages complex decisions. For example, the robot navigates corridors autonomously but the operator takes over for manipulating objects.
- Adjustable autonomy: The system dynamically shifts between autonomy levels based on the situation, task difficulty, and operator preference.
Business Applications of Teleoperation
Hazardous Environment Operations
Teleoperation is essential for work in environments dangerous to humans:
- Mining: Operating heavy machinery in underground mines, reducing exposure to collapse, gas, and dust hazards
- Oil and gas: Inspecting and maintaining offshore platforms and subsea infrastructure
- Nuclear facilities: Handling radioactive materials and performing maintenance in contaminated areas
- Disaster response: Exploring damaged structures and hazardous areas after earthquakes, floods, or industrial accidents
Remote Inspection and Maintenance
- Infrastructure inspection: Examining bridges, wind turbines, power lines, and pipelines using teleoperated drones and crawling robots
- Industrial equipment maintenance: Performing repairs and adjustments in difficult-to-access locations within factories and processing plants
- Subsea operations: Inspecting and maintaining underwater infrastructure for offshore energy, aquaculture, and telecommunications
Healthcare
- Telesurgery: Surgeons performing procedures on patients at distant locations using robotic surgical systems
- Remote diagnostics: Specialists examining patients through teleoperated diagnostic robots in rural or underserved areas
- Rehabilitation: Physical therapists guiding robotic rehabilitation devices for patients in remote locations
Autonomous Vehicle Fallback
Many autonomous vehicle and delivery robot companies use teleoperation as a safety fallback. When the autonomous system encounters a situation it cannot handle, a remote operator takes control to navigate through the challenge before returning control to the autonomous system.
Teleoperation in Southeast Asia
Teleoperation addresses several specific needs in the Southeast Asian context:
- Offshore energy: The region's extensive offshore oil and gas operations, particularly in the waters of Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand, and Brunei, benefit from teleoperated underwater robots that reduce the need for dangerous human diving operations.
- Mining: Mining operations in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Myanmar can use teleoperation to improve safety in underground and open-pit environments while maintaining productivity.
- Geographic distribution: ASEAN nations span vast geographic areas with varying infrastructure quality. Teleoperation enables skilled operators in urban centres to remotely operate equipment at distant sites, reducing the need to station specialists in remote locations.
- Agricultural applications: Teleoperated agricultural machinery can be operated from comfortable control centres, addressing labour shortages in rural areas across Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia while enabling a single operator to manage equipment across multiple locations.
- 5G deployment: The ongoing rollout of 5G networks across Southeast Asian markets is reducing latency and increasing bandwidth, making teleoperation viable for applications that previously required operators to be physically present.
Challenges and Limitations
Latency
Communication delay is the primary challenge in teleoperation. Even small delays of 200 to 500 milliseconds make precise manipulation difficult and can cause operator errors. Satellite communication introduces delays of 500 milliseconds or more, requiring predictive interfaces or supervisory control approaches.
Bandwidth
High-quality video feedback requires significant bandwidth. Multiple camera streams with sufficient resolution for safe operation can demand 10 to 50 megabits per second, which may not be available in remote locations or underwater environments.
Operator Fatigue
Continuous teleoperation is mentally demanding. Operators require regular breaks and should not work extended shifts without relief, creating staffing requirements that partially offset the benefit of remote operation.
Situational Awareness
Operating through cameras provides limited spatial awareness compared to being physically present. Depth perception, peripheral vision, and spatial orientation are all reduced, requiring training and experience to compensate.
Common Misconceptions
"Teleoperation is just a stepping stone to full autonomy." While autonomy is advancing, many applications will require human-in-the-loop teleoperation for the foreseeable future due to the unpredictability and complexity of real-world situations. Teleoperation and autonomy are complementary, not competing, technologies.
"Anyone can teleoperate a robot." Effective teleoperation requires training and practice. Operators need to develop skills in interpreting camera feeds, managing latency, and making decisions with limited information. Skilled teleoperators can be as valuable as skilled equipment operators.
"5G solves all teleoperation connectivity challenges." While 5G significantly improves latency and bandwidth in covered areas, many teleoperation scenarios occur in remote locations, underground, or underwater where 5G coverage is unavailable. Hybrid communication strategies remain necessary.
Getting Started with Teleoperation
- Identify operations where remote control would improve safety or enable access to skills not available on-site
- Assess your communication infrastructure and determine whether existing connectivity supports the latency and bandwidth requirements
- Start with supervisory control rather than direct teleoperation to reduce operator burden and latency sensitivity
- Invest in operator training as effective teleoperation is a skill that improves significantly with practice
- Plan for shared autonomy where the robot handles routine navigation and the operator focuses on high-value decisions
Teleoperation offers immediate, practical value for businesses that operate in hazardous, remote, or labour-constrained environments. For CEOs and CTOs, the business case is straightforward: teleoperation enables your most skilled operators to work on tasks anywhere without being physically present, while simultaneously removing humans from dangerous situations that create safety liabilities and insurance costs.
In Southeast Asia, teleoperation is particularly strategic for three reasons. First, the region's significant offshore energy, mining, and heavy industry sectors expose workers to substantial safety risks. Teleoperation reduces workplace injuries and fatalities, lowering both human and financial costs. Second, the geographic spread of operations across island nations like Indonesia and the Philippines makes it impractical and expensive to station skilled operators at every site. Teleoperation centralises expertise while distributing operational capability. Third, as autonomous systems are deployed across the region for delivery, agriculture, and logistics, teleoperation provides the essential safety net that enables commercial deployment of autonomous technologies that are not yet reliable enough to operate without human oversight.
For business leaders considering autonomous technology investments, ensuring robust teleoperation capability should be a non-negotiable requirement. It provides the safety fallback that regulators require and customers expect, while delivering immediate operational value even before full autonomy is achieved.
- Assess your communication infrastructure before investing in teleoperation. Conduct latency and bandwidth testing at actual operating locations to ensure the connectivity meets minimum requirements for your intended applications.
- Invest in quality operator interfaces. The effectiveness of teleoperation is heavily dependent on the quality of video, controls, and feedback provided to operators. Poor interfaces lead to errors, reduced productivity, and operator fatigue.
- Develop operator training programmes. Skilled teleoperators require practice to develop proficiency, and ongoing training maintains performance. Budget for training time and simulators.
- Plan for operator workload management. Teleoperation is mentally demanding and operators should not work extended shifts. Factor staffing levels into your operational planning.
- Evaluate shared autonomy approaches that let the robot handle routine tasks while the operator focuses on complex decisions. This reduces operator burden and makes teleoperation scalable.
- Consider cybersecurity requirements carefully. Remotely controlled robots create attack surfaces that must be protected through encryption, authentication, and network security measures.
- Start with non-critical applications to build confidence and experience before deploying teleoperation in safety-critical or high-value operations.
Frequently Asked Questions
What internet connectivity is needed for effective teleoperation?
Requirements vary by application. Simple supervisory control can work with as little as 1 to 5 megabits per second and 200 to 500 milliseconds latency. Direct teleoperation with video feedback typically needs 10 to 50 megabits per second and latency below 100 milliseconds for precise tasks. 4G connectivity is sufficient for many supervisory applications, while 5G enables more demanding direct control scenarios. For remote locations without cellular coverage, satellite internet can support supervisory control but latency of 500 or more milliseconds makes direct manipulation difficult. Hybrid approaches combining local autonomy with remote supervision often provide the best balance.
How does teleoperation compare to full automation in terms of cost?
Teleoperation typically has lower upfront technology costs than full automation because the AI requirements are simpler, but it has ongoing labour costs for operators. A typical teleoperation setup costs USD 50,000 to 200,000 for the robot and interface, plus USD 40,000 to 80,000 annually per operator. Full automation eliminates operator costs but requires more expensive AI systems, extensive testing, and typically longer development timelines. For many businesses, starting with teleoperation and gradually increasing autonomy provides the best path, delivering immediate operational value while building toward reduced labour dependence over time.
More Questions
Yes, with the right system design. In supervisory control mode, a single operator can effectively monitor and manage three to ten robots that operate mostly autonomously, intervening only when situations require human judgment. Some warehouse and delivery operations successfully deploy one operator per five to ten robots. However, for direct teleoperation requiring continuous attention, one operator per robot is typically necessary. The trend toward shared autonomy is increasing the ratio of robots to operators over time, with some advanced systems targeting fifteen to twenty robots per supervisor as autonomous capabilities improve.
Need help implementing Teleoperation?
Pertama Partners helps businesses across Southeast Asia adopt AI strategically. Let's discuss how teleoperation fits into your AI roadmap.